Open Access

Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications of PET/CT in Small-cell Lung Cancer

YUKINORI OKADA 1
TATSUHIKO ZAMA 1
TOMOHIRO ITONAGA 1
RYUJI MIKAMI 1
MITSURU OKUBO 1
SHINJI SUGAHARA 1
SHIHO WADA 1
TSUBASA KAWAMOTO 1
YUI MABUCHI 1
MASUMI KAWAGUCHI 1
MASANORI ISHIDA 1
MOTOKI NAKAI 1
KOICHIRO ABE 1
MANA YOSHIMURA 1
  &  
KAZUHIRO SAITO 1

1Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis Jul-Aug; 6(4): 608-618 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10561
Received 26 March 2026 | Revised 16 April 2026 | Accepted 23 April 2026
Corresponding author
Yukinori Okada, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. Tel: +81 333426111, e-mail: okadayu@tokyo-med.ac.jp
Download PDF pdf image icon

Abstract

Background/Aim
In small-cell lung cancer, treatment differs between extensive disease (ED) and limited disease (LD). Chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors is used in patients with ED. In patients with LD, chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors is used. Therefore, initial staging is important. Some reports exist on the utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT); in particular, PET/CT can change the diagnosis between LD and ED. This review aimed to summarize the utility of PET/CT in small-cell lung cancer.
Materials and Methods
We identified relevant articles published on PUBMED between 2010 and 2025 using selected keywords. We categorized the contents into disease staging, prognosis prediction, and topics, and then summarized section-by-section.
Results
In addition to cancer staging between ED and LD, PET/CT can be used to evaluate semiquantitative indicators such as the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and metabolic tumor volume (MTV). This is important as SUVmax, TLG, and MTV have been shown to predict treatment response.
Conclusion
PET/CT is useful for staging small-cell lung cancers. However, reports on its usefulness for prognostic prediction are mixed, with some finding it useful and others not. Further research is needed as treatment approaches for small-cell lung cancer are evolving.
Keywords: Small-cell lung cancer, positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging, maximum standardized uptake value, total lesion glycolysis, metabolic tumor volume, review

Introduction

Small-cell lung cancer is highly aggressive and has a poor prognosis (1). It comprises the following features: early metastatic spread, aggressive biology, and high frequency of disease relapse (1). The inactivation of RB1 and overexpression of the MYC family are related to its characteristics (2). In clinical practice, the classification of small-cell lung cancer as limited-stage (LD) and extensive-stage (ED) is important. In ED, chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors are the standard first-line therapies (3). In contrast, chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, especially accelerated fractionation, is the standard first-line therapy for LD (4, 5). Concurrently, the effect of including immune checkpoint inhibitors after chemoradiotherapy in LD has been reported (6). Based on these reports, accurate initial staging, particularly distinguishing between LD and ED, is important. Positron emission tomography (PET), especially PET-computed tomography (CT), is widely used for the diagnosis and staging of small-cell lung cancer. In PET/CT, fluorodeoxyglucose F18 (18F-FDG) is used as the radiopharmaceutical, reflecting glucose-like metabolic activity. The accumulated value of 18F-FDG is often evaluated using the standard uptake value (SUV) and its maximum value, SUVmax. Additionally, the metabolic tumor volume (MTV), which reflects the volume showing accumulation above a certain SUV value, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), which shows the volume by radiopharmaceutical uptake, are used. This review aims to synthesize articles on PET/CT for small-cell lung cancer to aid in future research.

Materials and Methods

We used PUBMED to identify relevant articles. We employed the keywords “small-cell lung cancer” and “PET” and identified an original article and review articles published between 2010 and 2025. We selected an original article by the first author, O. Y. (7), and included review articles (8-12). The contents were categorized into disease staging, prognosis prediction, and topics, and then summarized section-by-section.

Results

Disease staging.

Utility of PET/CT in staging. One report described the utility of PET/CT for staging. Specifically, in 250 patients with small-cell lung cancer, PET/CT changed the staging (13).

Diagnostic changes. In 46 cases of small-cell lung cancer (24 men, 22 women, mean age 63.5 years), CT and PET were used for diagnosis: 22 cases were classified as LD by both CT and PET, four were classified as ED by CT but LD by PET, 12 were classified as ED by both CT and PET, and eight were classified as ED by CT but LD by PET (14). In 33 small-cell lung cancer cases (13 men and 20 women; median age, 61 years), PET/CT was performed in 12 cases for initial staging and 11 cases for restaging. Among the 43 PET examinations, 19% resulted in a change in management based on PET findings (15). In 25 cases of small-cell lung cancer (24 men, 1 woman; 14LD,11ED; age 50-70 years), PET/CT led to upstaging in nine cases and downstaging in two (16). In a study of 73 patients with LD (60 men, 13 women; median age, 62 years), PET/CT revealed unexpected metastatic accumulation in 13 cases, leading to a change in the treatment plan (17). In 23 cases of small-cell lung cancer (19 men, 4 women; age 58±9 years), PET/CT elevated the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging in 12 cases (18). These results are shown in Table I.

Diagnostic accuracy by site. In 19 cases of small-cell lung cancer (10 men and 9 women; median age 67 years), PET demonstrated a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 87% for lymph node metastasis (19). Of the 95 small-cell lung cancer cases (71 men, 24 women, age 68±9 years), 30 (age 66±9 years) were positive for bone metastases by other methods, and 65 were negative. The sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT for bone metastases were reported as 100% and 100%, respectively, whereas bone scintigraphy showed a sensitivity of 37% and a specificity of 92% (20). In 62 small-cell lung cancer cases (54 men, 8 women; age, 69.8±7.8 years), comparing other imaging methods + head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. PET/CT + head MRI for each TNM classification factor yielded the following diagnostic accuracy rates: T factor 78.0% (46/59) vs. 84.7% (50/59), N factor 67.8% (40/59) vs. 89.8% (53/59), M factor 91.5% (54/59) vs. 96.6% (57/59), TNM: 72.9% (43/59) vs. 88.1% (52/59), and VALSG stage: 91.5% (54/59) vs. 96.6% (57/59). PET/CT has been reported to be superior for N factors and TNM staging (21). These results are shown in Table II.

Impact on prognosis. In 968 small cell lung cancer cases (76.8% male, 23.2% female, age 65.6±10.6 years) the use of PET-CT for staging improved diagnostic accuracy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer, resulting in improved overall survival (22). Furthermore, in a study of 54 cases of limited-disease small cell lung cancer (40 cases with PET-CT, 9 male, 31 female, median age 67 years; 14 cases without PET-CT, 3 male, 11 female, median age 59 years), multivariate analysis showed that the presence of PET-CT staging was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.11-0.56] for overall survival, ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1 vs. 2) had a hazard ratio of 1.87 (95%CI=1.01-3.48), and the presence of lymph node metastasis had a hazard ratio of 4.75 (95%CI=1.89-11.94) (23). Furthermore, in 147 cases of small cell lung cancer (69 male, 78 female), the presence or absence of pre-treatment PET-CT was reported to affect prognosis with a hazard ratio of 0.39 (95%CI=0.21-0.74) (24).

Comparison with other imaging modalities. In 164 cases of small-cell lung cancer (109 men and 55 women), PET/CT demonstrated increased uptake in the primary tumor (118 cases), lymph nodes (97 cases), and distant metastases (41 cases). When comparing contrast-enhanced CT with PET/CT, findings matched in 52 patients (43.7%). PET/CT detected lesions that contrast-enhanced CT missed in 35 cases (29.4%), whereas contrast-enhanced CT detected lesions not identified by PET/CT in 32 cases (26.9%) (25). These results suggest that combining PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT may be necessary to achieve more accurate staging.

Combination with blood tests. In 119 small-cell lung cancer cases (105 men, 14 women, median age 64 years), the ratio of MTV/monocyte-to-lymphocyte (MTV/MLR) showed an odds ratio of 8.67 [95%CI=3.51-21.42] for distinguishing between LD and ED, indicating its usefulness for differentiation (26).

Utility of PET/CT in prognostic prediction.

LD. Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for LD. Among the 59 patients with LD (46 men, 13 women, median age 67 years), some (n=41) received chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin+etoposide plus thoracic irradiation at 45 Gy/30 fractions/15 days, some (n=9) received chemotherapy alone, and some (n=5) received radiotherapy alone. Multivariate analysis showed that the SUVmax of the primary tumor was a factor affecting OS, with a hazard ratio of 1.133 (95%CI=1.042-1.231) (27). In 344 cases of small-cell lung cancer (292 men, 52 women, median age 61 years; 153 Stage I-III, 191 Stage IV), pre-treatment SUVmax=11.6 in Stage I-III patients was a prognostic factor with a hazard ratio of 1.88 (95%CI=1.15-3.08) (28). In 46 patients with Stage II-III small-cell lung cancer with lymph node metastasis (35 men, 11 women, median age 62 years), the following factors were associated with OS after chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin+etoposide plus chest irradiation with ≥60 Gy/30 fractions: i) presence of mediastinal lymph node metastasis, ii) lymph node MTV ≥39, hazard ratio 3.824 (95%CI=1.528-8.794), and iii) lymph node TLG ≥137, hazard ratio 3.543 (95%CI=1.662-7.386) (29). In 30 LD cases (29 men, 1 woman; median age 65 years) and chest irradiation of 54 Gy/30 fractions, the group with MTV ≤166.6 ml had a median survival of 76 months, whereas that with MTV >166.6 ml had a median survival of 22 months. Multivariate analysis showed a hazard ratio of 16.7 (3.26-85.1) for OS, indicating that MTV is a prognostic factor (30). In 41 cases of LD (37 men, 4 women, median age 63 years), after chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin/etoposide and thoracic irradiation (50 Gy/25 fractions to 60 Gy/30 fractions), the following factors were associated with OS: sex, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥400 IU/l, treatment response (PR/CR vs. SD/PD), and liver SUVmax (liver SUVmax) with a hazard ratio of 0.194 (95%CI=0.05-0.72); this result indicates that liver accumulation is a prognostic factor (31). In 125 cases of LD (110 men, 15 women, mean age 66.8±9 years), a liver SUVmean/Bone Marrow (BM) mean ratio (BM/L) of one is associated with a 1.6-fold increased risk of post-treatment mortality, and a primary tumor SUVmax/brain SUVmax ratio of >1 was associated with a 2-fold increased risk. This finding was consistent across multiple analyses. Increased bone marrow uptake indicates a poor prognosis (32). In 46 patients with LD (42 men, 4 women, median age 59 years), the SUVmax in the lymph node (>5.8) and age (>65 years) were poor prognostic factors (33). However, some studies have suggested that PET/CT uptake is not a prognostic factor. In 120 LD cases (52 men, 68 women; median age 65.5 years), SUVmean, SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were not prognostic factors for OS (34). In 50 LD cases (28 men and 22 women), SUVmax was not reported to be a prognostic factor for OS (35). These results are shown in Table III.

ED. Chemotherapy is the primary treatment for ED. In 154 cases of ED (123 men and 31 women; mean age, 60 years), MTV, and TLG were reported as indicators of response to initial anticancer drug therapy with cisplatin plus etoposide or carboplatin plus etoposide (36). Furthermore, in 46 ED cases (38 men, 8 women; median age, 74 years), MTV and TLG were reported to be factors influencing survival duration, exceeding 180 days when chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors were used (37). However, other reports have suggested that the MTV, TLG, and PET/CT uptake are not prognostic factors. In 68 ED cases (50 men, 18 women; median age, 67 years), MTV and TLG were not reported to be prognostic factors (38). These results are shown in Table IV.

LD and ED. Visual assessment: Among 29 patients with small-cell lung cancer (19 men, 10 women; ages 43-80; 13 patients with LD, 16 with ED), who received chemotherapy (primarily cisplatin+etoposide) and radiotherapy (chest irradiation: mean 54 Gy), eight later demonstrated complete metabolic response (CMR) on PET/CT, showing a relatively favorable prognosis with a relative risk of 0.10 (95%CI=0.0198-0.5356) compared to other cases (27).

Utility of MTV and TLG: In 106 cases of small-cell lung cancer (45 LD, 61 ED; 89 men, 17 women; median age 69 years), multivariate analysis showed that the group with a whole-body MTV exceeding 127 had a poor OS, with a hazard ratio of 2.11 (95%CI=1.31-3.39) (39). In 202 small-cell lung cancer cases (age 64.0±8.8 years, 179 men, 23 women, 95 LD, 107 ED), chemotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin+etoposide or irinotecan and chest irradiation of approximately 52.5 Gy in 25 fractions were delivered. A total MTV ≥100 was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 1.779 (95%CI=1.072-2.959), and a total TLG ≥555 was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 1.815 (95%CI=1.094-3.012) (40). In 55 cases of small-cell lung cancer (36 men, 19 women; 24 with LD and 31 with ED), disease progression occurred in six (10.9%). For TLG >443.8, the hazard ratio for OS was 2.1 (95%CI=1.14-3.871), with reported OS of 13.4 months vs. 25.7 months (41).

Utility of SUV: In 59 patients with small-cell lung cancer (39 men, 29 women; median age 67 years; 27 LD, 32 ED), PET/CT was performed before and after treatment. The group with an SUVpeak change ratio of -46.8% had poorer survival, with a hazard ratio for mortality of 2.6 (95%CI=1.4-4.8 for OS) (42). In 114 cases of small-cell lung cancer (105 men, 9 women, median age 67 years; 26 LD, 88 ED), multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥65 years, ≤3 cycles of chemotherapy, SD or PD at initial treatment, plus SUVmax of ≥24.6 had a hazard ratio of 3.970 for OS (95%CI=1.471-10.715) (43). In 98 patients with small-cell lung cancer (71 men, 27 women, median age 58 years; 41 LD, 57 ED), MTV and integrated standardized uptake value (iSUV) are prognostic factor for overall survival rate (44). In 256 men with small-cell lung cancer (mean age 63.8 years), age (<63 vs. ≥63 years), T stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and MTV were reported as survival factors with a hazard ratio of 1.51 (95%CI=1.15-1.99) (45). In 38 small-cell lung cancer cases (34 men, 4 women; age, 65.76±8.18 years), MTV ≥147 cm was reported as a prognostic factor (46). In 112 cases of small-cell lung cancer (92 men, 20 women, median age 58 years; 26 cases LD, 86 cases ED), poor survival was reported for NLR ≥4, MTV ≥60.1, whole body MTV ≥120, and whole body TLG ≥1,000 points. NLR has been reported to correlate with SUVmean (r=0.36), SUVmax (r=0.34), TLG (r=0.39), MTV (r=0.51), WBMTV (r=0.40), and WBTLG (r=0.46) (47). In 145 cases of small-cell lung cancer (122 men, 23 women, median age 67 years), the sum of SUVmax values for all lesions was calculated. Using a median total value of 21.9 as the cutoff, this was reported to be an independent prognostic factor, with a hazard ratio of 2.676 (95%CI=1.674-4.277) (48).

PET/CT measurements are not useful for predicting prognosis: Reports have also indicated that PET/CT measurements are not useful for predicting the prognosis of small-cell lung cancer. In 54 cases of small-cell lung cancer (50 men, 4 women; median age, 57 years; 30 ED, 24 LD), performance status and extent of disease spread were reported as prognostic factors, whereas PET factors were unrelated to prognosis (49). In 142 cases of small-cell lung cancer (124 men, 18 women, median age 58.2±10.1 years), PET/CT SUV was reported not to be a prognostic factor (50). In 77 cases of small-cell lung cancer (67 men and 10 women), SUVmax was not reported to be a prognostic factor (51). In 91 cases of small-cell lung cancer (75 men, 16 women), the status of extrapleural lesions was a prognostic factor for chemotherapy, whereas the MTV in intrapleural lesions was not related to prognosis (52). In 82 cases of small-cell lung cancer (75 men and 7 women), SUV was not a prognostic factor (53). In 90 cases of small-cell lung cancer, SUV was also reported not to be a prognostic factor (54). SUVmax was not a prognostic factor in 349 cases of small-cell lung cancer (294 men, 55 women, age 63 years; 224 ED, 125 LD) (55). These results are shown in Table V.

Topics.

Differences in pathology by location. Among 69 cases of small-cell lung cancer there were 28 central-type cases (23 men, 5 women; median age, 78 years) and 41 peripheral-type cases (34 men, 7 women; median age, 72 years). The MTV was 100.6±93.6 for the central type and 53.4±68.1 for the peripheral type, with the peripheral type showing a statistically significant lower value (56). TLG was 823.6±916.5 in a central type and 394.5±607.2 in the peripheral type, with the peripheral type showing a statistically significant decrease (56). Furthermore, it has been reported that the best prognosis is observed in peripheral-type cases with low TLG and MTV (56).

Correlation with tumor markers. In 21 cases of recurrent small-cell lung cancer (17 men, 4 women, age 37-79 years), NSE correlated with MTV (correlation coefficient 0.789) and TLG (correlation coefficient 0.872) in the group with NSE above the reference value (57). In addition, in the group with LDH levels above the reference range, LDH and MTV showed a correlation coefficient of 0.656, whereas TLG showed a correlation coefficient of 0.697 (57).

Correlation with Ki67. In 94 cases of small-cell lung cancer (75 men, 19 women; median age, 68 years), Ki67 showed no correlation with SUVmax but a correlation coefficient of 0.254 with MTV and 0.239 with TLG (58).

Circulating tumor cells. In total, 112 patients with cancer (67 men, 45 women; median age 59 years) were included. Overall, 87 cases tested positive for two or more circulating tumor cells (CTC). After cisplatin/carboplatin–etoposide chemotherapy, CTC positivity showed a hazard ratio of 4.73 (95%CI=1.05-13.90), and MTV showed a hazard ratio of 5.32 (95%CI=2.10-11.93), indicating that both are significant prognostic factors (59).

Bone marrow uptake. In 70 cases of small-cell lung cancer (60 men, 10 women, median age 68 years), a bone marrow SUVmax of ≥1.6 vs. <1.6 was reported to be a factor for progression-free survival with a hazard ratio of 2.28 (95%CI=1.27-4.28) (60).

Liver/muscle uptake and inflammation. In 155 cases of small-cell lung cancer (124 men, 31 women, 58 LD, 97 ED), the liver to muscle (rectus-femoris) uptake ratio (each SUV mean) was the prognostic factor for OS rate in patients with ED (uptake ratio ≥3.18, OS 7.85 months; uptake ratio <3.18, OS 9.40 months). Moreover, the C-reactive-protein to albumin ratio was a prognostic factor for OS (C-reactive-protein to albumin ratio >0.29, OS 7.55 months; C-reactive-protein to albumin ratio <0.29, OS 13.74 months) (61).

Time–radioactivity curve. In 10 small-cell lung cancer cases (9 men, 1 woman), dynamic PET/CT imaging revealed that the response to drug therapy could be predicted based on the slope of the time–radioactivity curve at 10 and 30 min (62).

Relationship with the central nervous system. In a report by the lead author (Okada et al.) (7), 19 cases diagnosed with LD (3 men, 6 women; age, 70.1±8.8 years) were examined with PET/CT. In the group with NSE values at or above the reference value of 16.3, the SUVmax in the hypothalamic–pituitary region was 4.10, while in the group with NSE below the cutoff value of 16.3 the SUVmax was 2.95 in the hypothalamic–pituitary region, showing a statistically significant difference (7). The SUVmax in the hypothalamic–pituitary region and NSE levels showed a correlation coefficient of r=0.458. When using an SUVmax cutoff value of 3.10, the sensitivity was 0.846, and the specificity was 0.833 for distinguishing between NSE values above and below the cutoff (7). The TLG in the hypothalamic–pituitary region and the primary tumor showed a correlation coefficient of r=0.53, whereas the TLG in the hypothalamic-pituitary region and the total tumor showed a correlation coefficient of r=0.424 (p=0.07) (7). Increased glucose metabolism in the hypothalamic–pituitary region was associated with small-cell lung cancer.

Artificial intelligence. In total, 98 small-cell lung cancer cases (66 men, 32 women) were classified into 98 training cases and 20 evaluation cases. Radiomic analysis was performed in 56 responders and 42 non-responders to platinum-based chemotherapy. Combining clinical data with radiomics yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.832-0.833, enabling the prediction of treatment response (63).

Discussion

In small-cell lung cancer, there are different therapeutic options for LD and ED. Nonetheless, PET-CT is useful for initial staging in both LD and ED and can help predict the treatment response. Some reports have discussed the utility of PET-CT parameters such as SUV, MTV, and TLG. While their utility has not been conclusively ascertained, these semi-quantitative parameters have potential. Moreover, 18F-FDG uptake in normal organs such as the liver, bone marrow and the hypothalamic–pituitary region indicates the pathological stage of the small-cell lung cancer.

The use of PET-CT in small-cell lung cancer has some limitations. First, semi-quantitative parameters such as SUV, MTV, and TLG may vary depending on the PET-CT machine. Second, the visual evaluation in PET-CT depends on operator experience. Third, the number of reports about the machine learning and radiomics are limited. Recently, in non-small cell lung cancer, the utility of machine learning and radiomics about the PET-CT are reported (64). Thus, further research under same conditions is necessary to validate the findings of this study.

Conclusion

PET/CT is considered useful for staging small-cell lung cancers. However, reports on its prognostic utility are mixed: some find it useful, whereas others do not. Further research is needed as treatment approaches for small-cell lung cancer are evolving.

Conflicts of Interest

Y.O. was a member of Expert Imaging and Interventional Support (EIIS), undertaking the medical imaging reading at Iga City General Hospital. All other Authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

Authors’ Contributions

Y.O: wrote the article; T.Z, T.I, R.M, M.O, S.S, S.W, T.K, Y.M, M.K: checked the article related to radiation oncology; M.I, M.Y, K.A, MA: checked the article as related to medical imaging and nuclear medicine; K.S: checked the article and provided suggestions regarding this research.

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Y.O received a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (No. 22K15809) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). This report utilized funds from this grant (https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-22K15809/).

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

The Authors used artificial intelligence (ChatGPT by OpenAI) for the final article check.

References

1 Shields MD Chiang AC & Byers LA Top advances of the year: Small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 131(6) e35770 2025. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35770
2 Zhai X Zhang Z Chen Y Wu Y Zhen C Liu Y Lin Y & Chen C Current and future therapies for small cell lung carcinoma. J Hematol Oncol. 18(1) 37 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-025-01690-6
3 Horn L Mansfield AS Szczęsna A Havel L Krzakowski M Hochmair MJ Huemer F Losonczy G Johnson ML Nishio M Reck M Mok T Lam S Shames DS Liu J Ding B Lopez-Chavez A Kabbinavar F Lin W Sandler A Liu SV & IMpower133 Study Group First-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 379(23) 2220 - 2229 2018. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809064
4 Turrisi AT Kim K Blum R Sause WT Livingston RB Komaki R Wagner H Aisner S & Johnson DH Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. N Engl J Med. 340(4) 265 - 271 1999. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199901283400403
5 Yu J Jiang L Zhao L Yang X Wang X Yang D Zhuo M Chen H Huang W Zhu Z Zhang M Song Y Li Q Ma Z Wang Q Qu Y Yu R Yu H Zhao J Shi A & Trial Management Group High-dose hyperfractionated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy versus standard-dose radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in China: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 12(10) 799 - 809 2024. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00189-9
6 Cheng Y Spigel DR Cho BC Laktionov KK Fang J Chen Y Zenke Y Lee KH Wang Q Navarro A Bernabe R Buchmeier EL Chang JW Shiraishi Y Sezgin Goksu S Badzio A Shi A Daniel DB Hoa NTT Zemanova M Mann H Gowda H Jiang H Senan S & ADRIATIC Investigators Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 391(14) 1313 - 1327 2024. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2404873
7 Okada Y Zama T Itonaga T Mikami R Okubo M Sugahara S Nakai M Abe K Yoshimura M & Saito K Association between PET-CT accumulation in the hypothalamic/pituitary regions and neuron-specific enolase/primary tumor in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a case-controlled retrospective study. EJNMMI Rep. 8(1) 4 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s41824-024-00190-z
8 Thomson D Hulse P Lorigan P & Faivre-Finn C The role of positron emission tomography in management of small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 73(2) 121 - 126 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.03.013
9 Lu YY Chen JH Liang JA Chu S Lin WY & Kao CH 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detecting extensive disease in small-cell lung cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 35(7) 697 - 703 2014. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000122
10 Mitchell MD Aggarwal C Tsou AY Torigian DA & Treadwell JR Imaging for the pretreatment staging of small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Acad Radiol. 23(8) 1047 - 1056 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.03.017
11 Zhu D Wang Y Wang L Chen J Byanju S Zhang H & Liao M Prognostic value of the maximum standardized uptake value of pre-treatment primary lesions in small-cell lung cancer on 18F-FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis. Acta Radiol. 59(9) 1082 - 1090 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0284185117745907
12 Quartuccio N Salem A Laudicella R Spataro A Chiaravalloti A Caobelli F Cistaro A Alongi P & Evangelista L The role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in restaging patients with small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Nucl Med Commun. 42(8) 839 - 845 2021. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001407
13 Choi M Lee Y Moon SH Han JY Kim HT & Lee JS Effect of accurate staging using positron emission tomography on the outcomes of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with limited stage small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 18(1) 77 - 84 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.06.012
14 Azad A Chionh F Scott AM Lee ST Berlangieri SU White S & Mitchell PL High impact of 18F-FDG-PET on management and prognostic stratification of newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 12(4) 443 - 451 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-009-0295-z
15 Gregory DL Brennan SM Stillie A Herschtal A Hicks RJ MacManus MP & Ball DL Impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and treatment response assessment of extra-pulmonary small-cell cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 54(2) 100 - 107 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02146.x
16 Arslan N Tuncel M Kuzhan O Alagoz E Budakoglu B Ozet A & Ozguven MA Evaluation of outcome prediction and disease extension by quantitative 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-d-glucose with positron emission tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 25(6) 406 - 413 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-011-0478-y
17 Sohn BS Lee DH Kim EK Yoon DH Kim HO Ryu JS Kim SW & Suh C The role of integrated 18F-FDG PET-CT as a staging tool for limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study. Onkologie. 35(7-8) 432 - 438 2012. DOI: 10.1159/000341073
18 Saima R Humayun B & Khalid NI Triage of limited versus extensive disease on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan in small cell lung cancer. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol. 5(2) 109 - 113 2017. DOI: 10.22038/aojnmb.2017.8751
19 Hockmann J Hautzel H Darwiche K Eberhard W Stuschke M Aigner C Herrmann K & Plönes T Accuracy of nodal staging by 18F-FDG-PET/CT in limited disease small-cell lung cancer. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 31(6) 506 - 511 2023. DOI: 10.1177/02184923231187279
20 Lee JW Lee SM Lee HS Kim YH & Bae WK Comparison of diagnostic ability between 99mTc-MDP bone scan and 18F-FDG PET/CT for bone metastasis in patients with small cell lung cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 26(8) 627 - 633 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-012-0622-3
21 Kishida Y Seki S Yoshikawa T Itoh T Maniwa Y Nishimura Y & Ohno Y Performance comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT plus brain MRI and conventional staging plus brain MRI in staging of small cell lung carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 211(1) 185 - 192 2018. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.18935
22 Dayen C Debieuvre D Molinier O Raffy O Paganin F Virally J Larive S Desurmont-Salasc B Perrichon M Martin F & Grivaux M New insights into stage and prognosis in small cell lung cancer: an analysis of 968 cases. J Thorac Dis. 9(12) 5101 - 5111 2017. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.52
23 Xanthopoulos EP Corradetti MN Mitra N Fernandes AT Kim M Grover S Christodouleas JP Evans TL Stevenson JP Langer CJ Lee TT Pryma DA Lin LL Simone CB 2nd Apisarnthanarax S & Rengan R Impact of PET staging in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 8(7) 899 - 905 2013. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31828e8996
24 Winther-Larsen A Hoffmann L Moeller DS Khalil AA & Knap MM Evaluation of factors associated with loco-regional failure and survival in limited disease small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 54(9) 1574 - 1581 2015. DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1062135
25 Quartuccio N Evangelista L Alongi P Caobelli F Altini C Cistaro A Lambertini A Schiorlin I Popescu CE Linguanti F Laudicella R Scalorbi F Di Pierro G Asabella AN Cuppari L Margotti S Lima GM Scalisi S Pacella S Kokomani A Ciaccio A Sturiale L Vento A Cardile D Baldari S Panareo S Fanti S Rubini G Schillaci O Chiaravalloti A & Young AIMN Working Group Prognostic and diagnostic value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in restaging patients with small cell lung carcinoma: an Italian multicenter study. Nucl Med Commun. 40(8) 808 - 814 2019. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001038
26 Hu Y Sun J Li D Li Y Li T & Hu Y The combined role of PET/CT metabolic parameters and inflammatory markers in detecting extensive disease in small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol. 12 960536 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.960536
27 Kwon SH Hyun SH Yoon JK An YS Oh YT Choi JH Park KJ & Lee SJ The highest metabolic activity on FDG PET is associated with overall survival in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 95(5) e2772 2016. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002772
28 Özdemir Ö Batum Ö Ermin S Aksel N Kömürcüoğlu B Mertoğlu A Deniz S Balcı G Koparal H Özbilek E & Yılmaz U Metabolic activity of primary tumour on PET/CT has a relationship with survival in stages I-III small-cell lung carcinoma. Clin Respir J. 14(8) 695 - 702 2020. DOI: 10.1111/crj.13186
29 Jin F Qu B Fu Z Zhang Y Han A Kong L & Yu J Prognostic value of metabolic parameters of metastatic lymph nodes on 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer with lymph node involvement. Clin Lung Cancer. 19(1) e101 - e108 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.06.006
30 Chang H Lee SJ Lim J Lee JS Kim YJ & Lee WW Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by (18)F-FDG PET/CT in limited-stage small-cell lung carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 145(5) 1361 - 1367 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-02848-9
31 Lee J Kim JO Jung CK Kim YS Yoo IR Choi WH Jeon EK Hong SH Chun SH Kim SJ Kim YK & Kang JH Metabolic activity on [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and glucose transporter-1 expression might predict clinical outcomes in patients with limited disease small-cell lung cancer who receive concurrent chemoradiation. Clin Lung Cancer. 15(2) e13 - e21 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2013.09.005
32 Kavurgaci S Özmen Ö Tatci E Söyler Y Cengiz Tİ Kabalak PA Kizilgöz D & Yilmaz Ü Potential role of pre-treatment bone marrow SUVmean to liver SUVmean ratio (BM/L) and comparison of primary tumour FDG uptake with brain FDG uptake in predicting survival in limited-stage lung cancers. Nucl Med Commun. 45(1) 77 - 85 2024. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001778
33 Aktan M Koc M Kanyilmaz G & Yavuz BB Prognostic value of pre-treatment 18F-FDG-PET uptake in small-cell lung cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 31(6) 462 - 468 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-017-1178-z
34 Ong LT Dunphy M Foster A Woo KM Zhang Z Perez CA Pietanza CM Rosenzweig KE Gelblum DY Rimner A & Wu AJ Prognostic value of preradiotherapy (18)F-FDG PET/CT volumetrics in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 17(3) 184 - 188 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.07.004
35 Gomez DR Gladish GW Wei X Kotamarti KR Allen PK Cox JD O’Reilly MS Erasmus JJ Fossella FV & Komaki R Prognostic value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings in limited-stage small cell lung cancer before chemoradiation therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 37(1) 77 - 80 2014. DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31826b9cb8
36 Yu X Zhu Y Wang J Song X Zhu L Men X Li X Dai D & Xu W Pretreatment metabolic parameters measured by 18F-FDG-PET to predict the outcome of first-line chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 38(2) 193 - 200 2017. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000637
37 Hashimoto K Kaira K Imai H Miura Y Shiono A Mouri A Yamaguchi O Kobayashi K Kagamu H & Kuji I Metabolic tumor volume as significant predictor for chemotherapy containing PD-L1 blocker in extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 44(4) 1541 - 1551 2024. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16951
38 Grambow-Velilla J Seban RD Chouahnia K Assié JB Champion L Girard N Bonardel G Matton L Soussan M Chouaïd C & Duchemann B Total metabolic tumor volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT is a useful prognostic biomarker for patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer undergoing first-line chemo-immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 15(8) 2223 2023. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082223
39 Oh JR Seo JH Chong A Min JJ Song HC Kim YC & Bom HS Whole-body metabolic tumour volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 39(6) 925 - 935 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-2059-7
40 Park SB Choi JY Moon SH Yoo J Kim H Ahn YC Ahn MJ Park K & Kim BT Prognostic value of volumetric metabolic parameters measured by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Imaging. 14(1) 2 2014. DOI: 10.1186/1470-7330-14-2
41 Zer A Domachevsky L Rapson Y Nidam M Flex D Allen AM Stemmer SM Groshar D & Bernstine H The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT on staging and prognosis in patients with small cell lung cancer. Eur Radiol. 26(9) 3155 - 3161 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4132-2
42 Kim H Yoo IR Boo SH Park HL O JH & Kim SH Prognostic value of pre- and post-treatment FDG PET/CT parameters in small cell lung cancer patients. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 52(1) 31 - 38 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-017-0490-9
43 Kim MH Lee JS Mok JH Lee K Kim KU Park HK Kim SJ & Lee MK Metabolic burden measured by (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography is a prognostic factor in patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 46(2) 165 - 171 2014. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.165
44 Zhu D Ma T Niu Z Zheng J Han A Zhao S & Yu J Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 73(3) 332 - 337 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.007
45 Türk MA Kömürcüoğlu B Agüloğlu N Çiftçi TD Fidan M Çolak S & Batum Ö The association of metabolic positron emission tomography/computed tomography parameters with survival in small cell lung cancer. Ann Saudi Med. 45(1) 25 - 32 2025. DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2025.25
46 Araz M Soydal C Özkan E Sen E Nak D Kucuk ON Gönüllü U & Kir KM Prognostic value of metabolic parameters on baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT in small cell lung cancer. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 66(1) 61 - 66 2022. DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4785.19.03169-8
47 Mirili C Guney IB Paydas S Seydaoglu G Kapukaya TK Ogul A Gokcay S Buyuksimsek M Yetisir AE Karaalioglu B & Tohumcuoglu M Prognostic significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and correlation with PET–CT metabolic parameters in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Int J Clin Oncol. 24(2) 168 - 178 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1338-8
48 Go SI Song HN Kang JH Kang MH Kim MJ Jung J Chung SI Choi BH Hwang IG Kim SH Ling H & Lee GW The clinical impact of the sum of the maximum standardized uptake value on the pretreatment with F-FDG-PET/CT in small-cell lung cancer. Oncology. 86(1) 1 - 9 2014. DOI: 10.1159/000357136
49 Inal A Kucukoner M Kaplan M Urakcı Z Nas N Guven M Dostbil Z Altındag S & Isıkdogan A Is 18F-FDG-PET/CT prognostic factor for survival in patients with small cell lung cancer? Single center experience. Rev Port Pneumol. 19(6) 260 - 265 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.rppneu.2013.03.007
50 Yilmaz Demirci N Yilmaz Ü Biner Uslu I Dikmen A Yılmaz A & Erdoğan Y Prognostic significance of standardised uptake value (SUVmax) measured on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 26(5) e12485 2017. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12485
51 Çimen F Aloglu M Düzgün S Şentürk A Atikcan Ş & Özmen Ö What is the effect of tumor diameter, lymph node metastases, and SUVmax value on prognosis in limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 68(9) 1252 - 1258 2022. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220325
52 Oh JR Seo JH Hong CM Jeong SY Lee SW Lee J Min JJ Song HC Bom HS Kim YC & Ahn BC Extra-thoracic tumor burden but not thoracic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET/CT is an independent prognostic biomarker for extensive-disease small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 81(2) 218 - 225 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.05.001
53 Kim SJ & Chang S Limited prognostic value of SUVmax measured by F-18 FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer patients. Oncol Res Treat. 38(11) 577 - 585 2015. DOI: 10.1159/000441289
54 Dinc NS Aydın K Odabas H Ercelep O Tufan G Seker M Yasar N Aydin D Yuksel S Mert A Ozcelik M Korkmaz T Yildiz R Aliustaoglu M Mayadagli A Dane F & Gumus M Pretreatment PET/CT standardized uptake values play a role in predicting response to treatment and survival in patients with small cell lung cancer. Oncol Res Treat. 39(3) 130 - 134 2016. DOI: 10.1159/000444272
55 Tas F Ozturk A & Erturk K Primary tumor SUVmax and ratio of SUVmax to primary tumor size on pretreatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan in small cell lung cancer: which is superior for the prognosis. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 135(17-18) 478 - 487 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-023-02160-0
56 Nobashi T Koyasu S Nakamoto Y Kubo T Ishimori T Kim YH Yoshizawa A & Togashi K Prognostic value of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters differs according to primary tumour location in small-cell lung cancer. Br J Radiol. 89(1059) 20150618 2016. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150618
57 Shi P Meng X Ni M Sun X Xing L & Yu J Association between serum tumor markers and metabolic tumor volume or total lesion glycolysis in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 10(5) 3123 - 3128 2015. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3673
58 Park S Lee E Rhee S Cho J Choi S Lee S Eo JS Pahk K Choe JG & Kim S Correlation between semi-quantitative (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and Ki-67 expression in small cell lung cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 50(1) 24 - 30 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-015-0363-z
59 Fu L Zhu Y Jing W Guo D Kong L & Yu J Incorporation of circulating tumor cells and whole-body metabolic tumor volume of (18)F-FDG PET/CT improves prediction of outcome in IIIB stage small-cell lung cancer. Chin J Cancer Res. 30(6) 596 - 604 2018. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.06.04
60 Lee JW Choi JS Lyu J & Lee SM Prognostic significance of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of bone marrow measured on positron emission tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 118 41 - 47 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.01.020
61 Başkurt K Demirtaş Şenlik S Uyar GC Yeşilbaş E Çakmak Öksüzoğlu ÖB & Sütcüoğlu O Prognostic significance of liver-to-muscle FDG uptake ratio and ınflammatory biomarkers in small cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 28(4) 1198 - 1210 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-04070-1
62 Wang Y Yao Z He X Zhao J Huang D Wu R Yang X Zhang M Sun T & Liang Y Utilizing temporal information to assess metabolic heterogeneity: a study of (18)F-FDG dynamic positron emission tomography as a treatment response biomarker in small cell lung cancer. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 15(5) 4274 - 4285 2025. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1687
63 Peng M Yang X Wang Y Zhou L Ge F Liu S Liu W Cheng L & Wang K Clinical combined PET/CT radiomics model prediction of benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 46(6) 558 - 569 2025. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001971
64 Lim CH Koh YW Hyun SH & Lee SJ A machine learning approach using PET/CT-based radiomics for prediction of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 42(12) 5875 - 5884 2022. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16096