Open Access

Wirsching Psychosocial Risk Scale (WPRS) Versus Outcome in Patients With Breast Disease and Breast Cancer: A Prospective 25-year Follow-up Study in Patients With Breast Cancer Symptoms

MATTI ESKELINEN 1
RIIKA KOSKELA 2
TUOMAS SELANDER 3
KAI KAARNIRANTA 4
PAULA OLLONEN 5
  &  
MAARET ESKELINEN 1

1Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland

2Department of Anaesthesiology, KUH and School of Medicine, UEF, Kuopio, Finland

3Science Service Center, KUH, Kuopio, Finland

4Department of Ophthalmology, KUH and School of Medicine, UEF, Kuopio, Finland

5Department of Psychiatry, KUH and School of Medicine, UEF, Kuopio, Finland

Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis Mar-Apr; 6(2): 245-256 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10524
Received 23 October 2025 | Revised 21 November 2025 | Accepted 17 December 2025
Corresponding author
Matti Eskelinen, MD, PhD, School of Medicine, UEF, P.O. Box 1711, FI-70211 KYS, Finland. Tel: +358 17173311, Fax: +358 17172611, GSM: +358 400969444, e-mail: matti.eskelinen@kuh.fi
Download PDF pdf image icon

Abstract

Background/Aim
This study evaluated whether Wirsching Psychosocial Risk (WPR) scale for measuring the severity of psychosocial risk (PR) factors can predict the long-term outcomes in patients having breast carcinoma (BC) symptoms.
Patients and Methods
A totalof 115 patients with BC symptoms completed the WPR scale and associations between WPR scale and long-term outcome were analyzed using survival models.
Results
The WPRS scores correlated to Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (r=0.382, p<0.001), to Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS) (r=0.517, p<0.001), to Forsen inventory (FI) during 0-2 years (r=0.392, p<0.001) and FI 2-6 years (r=0.397, p<0.001) prodromal periods and to State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI) (r=0.131, p=0.164) levels.In the Cox model, the WPR scale predicted the 25-year relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with BC [hazard ratio (HR)=1.76, p=0.197] and the WPR scale predicted 25-year overall survival (OS) in women with BC symptoms (HR=2.31, p=0.019) and women with BC (HR=2.12, p=0.09). In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis by the log-rank test, the 25-year relapse rate differed between low WPRS score (<21) versus the high WPRS score (≥21) in patients with BC (37.5% versus 20%, log-rank p-value=0.195). Also, the low WPRS score (<21) was a favorable predictor of RFS [HR=1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.80-2.99, p=0.199] in the patients with BC symptoms. The 25-year OS rate differed significantly between low WPRS score (<21) versus high WPRS score (≥21) patients with BC symptoms (74.4% versus 53.0%, log-rank p-value=0.016). A similar pattern was seen in patients with BC as the WPRS score predicted 25-year OS in women with BC (45.8% versus 20.0%, log-rank p-value=0.088).
Conclusion
The studies assessing the impact of PR factors on outcome of patients with BC symptoms have not reported WPRS levels. In the present study, a 25-year follow-up of patients with BC symptoms enables us to detect the 25-year outcome and to assess the RFS and OS versus WPRS approach using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. The study showed that the PR variables detected with the WPR scale significantly correlate to the 25-year OS in patients with BC and 25-year OS in patients with BC symptoms. Therefore, the use of WPRS inventory detecting PR factors should be considered as a useful part of the diagnostic protocol of patients with BC symptoms. 
Keywords: Psychosocial risk, Wirsching scale, breast cancer symptoms, long-term outcome

Introduction

Breast carcinoma (BC) is the most common carcinoma in women (1-5) and one of the main public health problems worldwide (6, 7). Although several risk factors for BC (8-10) have been identified, the role of life stressors remains unclear on etiology and outcome of BC (11-13). Beliefs about the causes of BC in general appear to vary widely and are often inaccurate (14). For example, fewer than half of the respondents in one national survey by Breslow et al. (15) were able to correctly identify a single risk factor for a variety of cancers. Similarly, fewer than half of the female cancer survivors in a study by Wold et al. (16) believed that physical inactivity, obesity, and diet were important causes of BC. Findings from the National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey further demonstrate that beliefs about the causal role of lifestyle behaviors vary across cancer sites and therefore individuals are often unaware or may not believe in cancer causes or risk factors that are modifiable through behavior change. In a study by Wang et al. (17), heredity (84.4%) was ranked as the most important causal factor, followed by the changes in one’s immune system (60.6%), smoking (58.3%), pollution in the environment (57.6%), aging (48.8%), diet or eating habits (46.4%), lack of exercise (35.7%), alcohol (29.9%), stress (27.5%) and prior breast surgery (23.7%).

At present, there is few evidence for any biological assumption (18-20) through which psychosocial risk (PR) factors could predict the etiology or outcome in patients having BC. However, several possible mechanisms have been suggested, most of these hypotheses implicate hormonal status or immunological functions (21-25).

The findings from the above-mentioned studies motivated us to conduct the current study with the aim of searching an association between the features of PR detected with the WPR scale versus the 25-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and the overall survival (OS) in women diagnosed in Breast Cancer Diagnostic Unit (BCDU) of Kuopio University hospital. No previous studies are available, where the outcome of the PR factors with the WPRS approach had been estimated using survival models.

Patients and Methods

Patients. The study cohort included 115 patients with BC symptoms diagnosed in BCDU, KUH, Finland, of whom 34 (29.6%) were patients with BC and 81 non-BC patients (70.4%) (Table I). The detailed description of the study protocol is shown in earlier reports by Ollonen et al. (26-29). The Kuopio Breast Cancer (KBC) study is a multidisciplinary cooperative project conducted by different departments of the UEF and KUH. The participants of the project included all women who were referred to KUH for breast examination between April 1990 and December 1995. The KBC study follows the protocol of the International Collaborative Study of Breast and Colorectal Cancer coordinated by the European Institute of Oncology in Milan and was initiated as a SEARCH program of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The collaborative study is based on the assumption that BC and colorectal cancer may have common risk factors.

Wirsching Psychosocial Risk Scale (WPRS). We used a modified WPRS for psychosocial risk assessment (30-32) with 10 scales; each scale has subscales from grade 1 to grade 5. The researchers estimated the patients’ psychosocial risk, and the test was rated as follows: grade I (subscale grade 3), low psychosocial risk; grade II (subscale grade 2 and subscale grade 4), moderate psychosocial risk; grade III (subscale grade 1 and subscale grade 5), high psychosocial risk for BC. All patients completed the WPRS with ten variables listed in Table II and each variable classified into five grades. A detailed description of the WPRS protocol is shown in earlier reports (30-32).

Sifneos Alexithymia Inventory (SAI) for alexithymic characteristics. A detailed description of the SAI scale is shown in earlier reports (33, 34).

Forsen (FI) psychological stress (PS) inventory. A detailed description of the FI scale is shown in earlier reports (35-37).

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). A detailed description of the BDI score protocol is shown in earlier reports (38-40).

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). A detailed description of the MADRS score protocol is shown in earlier reports (41-43).

Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI). A detailed description of the STAI score protocol is shown in earlier reports (44, 45).

Statistical analysis. Baseline group differences were analyzed by two-sided chi-square and non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis tests. RFS was calculated from the time of diagnosis to the occurrence of the first relapse, contralateral BC, or metastatic disease. OS was assessed as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of last follow-up or death of the patient. The effect of the WPRS protocol on the RFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the difference between the groups was assessed using the log-rank test. The p-values and the hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard models. Pearson’s method was used to test for correlation between WPRS scores and SAI, FI, STAI, BDI and MADRS scale values. Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS statistical software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0, IBM Corporation Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

BDI, MADRS, STAI, FI, SAI and WPRS levels in BC and non-BC patients. The baseline data and mean score values of BDI, MADRS, STAI, FI and SAI scales in three study groups; HSP, BBD and BC are presented in Table I. The mean BDI, MADRS, STAI, FI scale (0-2 years) and FI scale (2-6 years) values between BC and non-BC patients were quite similar (p=0.70, 0.78, 0.29, 0.99, 0.43, respectively, Table I). The mean SAI score values were significantly higher in non-BC patients (HSP=27.2 and BBD=28.7) versus BC patients (24.0, p=0.003, Table I). The mean WPRS levels were significantly higher in BC patients (19.4, p=0.05, Table I) versus non-BC patients (HSP=17.2 and BBD=17.6). The WPRS levels correlated to BDI (r=0.382, p<0.001), to MADRS (r=0.517, p<0.001, Figure 1), to FI during 0-2 years (r=0.392, p<0.001) and FI 2-6 years (r=0.397, p<0.001) prodromal periods and to STAI(r=0.131, p=0.164) levels.

The 25-year RFS and OS. In the Cox model, the WPRS inventory predicted the 25-year RFS in patients with BC (HR=1.76, p=0.197) and the WPRS predicted 25-year OS in women with BC symptoms (HR=2.31, p=0.019) and women with BC (HR=2.12, p=0.09). In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis by the log-rank test, the 25-year relapse rate differed between low WPRS levels (<21) versus the high WPRS levels (≥21) in patients with BC (37.5% versus 20%, log-rank p-value=0.195; Table III). Also, the low WPRS levels (<21) showed as a favorable predictor of the RFS (HR=1.50, 95% CI=0.80-2.99, p=0.199; Table IV) in the patients with BC symptoms. The 25-year OS rate differed significantly between low WPRS levels (<21) versus the high WPRS levels (≥21) patients with BC symptoms (74.4% versus 53.0%, log-rank p-value=0.016, Figure 2). A similar pattern was seen in patients with BC as the WPRS predicted 25-year OS in women with BC (45.8% versus 20.0%, log-rank p-value=0.088, Figure 3). 

Discussion

At present, there is few evidence for any biological assumption through which PR factors could predict the etiology or outcome in patients having BC. Several possible mechanisms have been suggested, most of these hypotheses implicate hormonal status or immunological functions of patients (18-26). 

Raison et al. (18) reviewed studies reporting increased levels of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) versus nondepressed individuals. According to the review, they suggest that MDD may partly be an inflammatory condition.

Hashmi et al. (19) studied brain activity in patients with back pain in 2 months prodromal period versus patients with no back pain in 12 months prodromal period. Their results showed that there is association between back pain and brain activity (BA), since the location of BA shifted from regions involved in acute pain to chronic pain locations. Authors provided a time window (6-12 months) for the stabilization of this signature, which could be a specific ‘functional biomarker’ for long-term back pain. Thus, their results have important clinical implications regarding the optimal time window for treatments targeting its prevention.

Duric et al. (21) reviewed the recent evidence of stress versus activation of the immune response system and release of common proinflammatory mediators. They suggest that there is need for research to find any biological mechanism through which PR factors could predict the outcome in disease.

Miller et al. (22) investigated whether depression is associated with cellular immunity in patients with MDD (n=32 patients) versus 32 healthy female control participants. In addition, they tried to identify neuroendocrine and behavioral pathways that might account for this relationship. The study groups were matched for age and none of the participants were taking medication, and all participants were free of disease involving the immune system. The patients with MDD had reduced proliferative responses to the mitogens concanavalin A and phytohemagglutinin compared with control participants. Depression was also associated with greater tobacco and caffeine consumption, less physical activity, and poorer sleep quality.

Gerdin et al. (23) studied the effects of acute PS factors on human colorectal mucosal barrier function and stress-induced modulation of mucosal immunity. Healthy volunteers were submitted to acute PS and colorectal mucosal biopsies were obtained to assess the impact of PS factors on barrier function. Authors found that PS factors increased paracellular permeability in the colorectal mucosa of healthy study participants. Authors concluded that there is a link between PS factors and increased intestinal permeability in human colorectal mucosa and stress and barrier dysfunction are contributing factors in gastrointestinal diseases.

La Torre et al. (24) reviewed the mechanisms that are involved in stress-induced intestinal permeability changes. An impaired intestinal barrier function can be harmful, because it allows the translocation of luminal antigens and toxins into the subepithelial tissue and bloodstream, which may lead to local and systemic immune responses. The reviewed in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that the PS factors can increase intestinal permeability via mast-cell dependent mechanisms and interfere with intestinal barrier integrity. However, authors admit that the results are difficult to compare, because animal and human studies vary highly in both PS type and duration and intestinal permeability measure.

Hilakivi-Clarke et al. (14, 24) investigated the association between social isolation (ISO) and BC and suggested ISO as risk factor for BC. Authors defined ISO as loneliness or an absence of perceived social connections (14, 24). The same authors (25) recently reported that ISO factors could activate inflammatory and mitochondrial metabolic pathways in the Sague Dawley rat mammary gland leading to BC. The authors concluded that the immune system appears to play an important role as a mediator between personality and cancer (13, 24, 25). In line with this hypothesis, recent randomized controlled trial suggests that women with increased IL-8 levels have decreased depressive symptoms in BC (46). Moreover, levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were inversely correlated with the cognitive efficiency cluster in BC (47). However, polymorphisms in genes regulating neuroplasticity may change inflammation-associated cognitive depressive symptoms in BC (48). Interestingly, increased emotional distress and stress even in daughters of BC patients was associated with decreased natural cytotoxic activity, elevated levels of stress hormones and decreased secretion of Th1 cytokines (49).

The findings from the above-mentioned studies motivated us to conduct the current study with the aim of searching an association between PS events detected with WPRS scoring versus the 25-year outcome with RFS and OS in women with BC symptoms diagnosed in BCDU. No previous studies are available where the outcome of the PS events with the WPRS approach had been estimated using survival models.

Taken together, the aim was to investigate the characteristics of the PR events with the WPRS model in women with BC symptoms and to report their link with outcome. The results showed that the PR events detected with WPRS scale correlate to the 25-year OS in the women with BC and women with BC symptoms. The present data indicate that the WPRS protocol seem to have the potential to enhance the DA of the PR testing in women with BC symptoms. 

Conclusion

Various risk factors for BC have been identified, many of which are related to reproductive characteristics, hormonal physiology, and life-style. The studies to date assessing PR events on outcome of women with BC have not considered WPRS inventory. Until now, the lack of long follow-up time of women with BC has delayed the advance in survival model calculations. The follow-up of women with BC symptoms enables us to detect the 25-year outcome and to assess the RFS and OS versus PR events detected with WPRS approach using survival models. The present study showed that the PR events detected with the WPRS significantly correlate to the 25-year OS in patients with BC and in patients with BC symptoms. Therefore, the use of WPRS protocol detecting PR events should be considered as a useful part of the diagnostic protocol of patients with BC symptoms.

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors report no conflicts of interest or financial ties regarding this study.

Authors’ Contributions

All Authors contributed to the collection and analysis of data, drafting and revising the manuscript, and read and approved the final article.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

No artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including large language models or machine learning software, were used in the preparation, analysis, or presentation of this manuscript.

References

1 Bray F Jemal A Grey N Ferlay J & Forman D Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008–2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 13 (8) 790 - 801 2012. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70211-5
2 Luengo-Fernandez R Leal J Gray A & Sullivan R Economic burden of cancer across the European Union: a population-based cost analysis. Lancet Oncol. 14 (12) 1165 - 1174 2013. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70442-X
3 Soerjomataram I & Bray F Planning for tomorrow: global cancer incidence and the role of prevention 2020–2070. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 18 (10) 663 - 672 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-021-00514-z
4 GBD 2021 Causes of Death Collaborators Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 403 (10440) 2100 - 2132 2024. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00367-2
5 GBD 2023 Cancer Collaborators The global, regional, and national burden of cancer, 1990-2023, with forecasts to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Lancet. 406 (10512) 1565 - 1586 2025. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01635-6
6 Iwakura M Nagashima K Shimizu K Tanihara S Terata K Yamazaki T Jung S Kimura T Terauchi M & Nomura K Resignation in working women with breast and gynecologic cancers. JAMA Netw Open. 8 (8) e2528844 2025. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28844
7 Vancoppenolle J Franzen N Azarang L Juslin T Krini M Lubbers T Mattson J Mayeur D Menezes R Schmitt J Scotte F Seoane López O Skaali T Ubels J Schlander M Retel V van Harten WH & OECI Working Group Health Economics Financial toxicity and socioeconomic impact of cancer in Europe. ESMO Open. 10 (6) 105293 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105293
8 Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer. 87 (11) 1234 - 1245 2002. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600596
9 Pashayan N Antoniou AC Ivanus U Esserman LJ Easton DF French D Sroczynski G Hall P Cuzick J Evans DG Simard J Garcia-Closas M Schmutzler R Wegwarth O Pharoah P Moorthie S De Montgolfier S Baron C Herceg Z Turnbull C Balleyguier C Rossi PG Wesseling J Ritchie D Tischkowitz M Broeders M Reisel D Metspalu A Callender T de Koning H Devilee P Delaloge S Schmidt MK & Widschwendter M Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 17 (11) 687 - 705 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0388-9
10 Bowen DJ Fernandez Poole S White M Lyn R Flores DA Haile HG & Williams DR The role of stress in breast cancer incidence: risk factors, interventions, and directions for the future. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18 (4) 1871 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041871
11 Hilakivi-Clarke L Rowland J Clarke R & Lippman ME Psychosocial factors in the development and progression of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 29 (2) 141 - 160 1994. DOI: 10.1007/BF00665676
12 Falagas ME Zarkadoulia EA Ioannidou EN Peppas G Christodoulou C & Rafailidis PI The effect of psychosocial factors on breast cancer outcome: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res. 9 (4) R44 2007. DOI: 10.1186/bcr1744
13 Chiriac VF Baban A & Dumitrascu DL Psychological stress and breast cancer incidence: a systematic review. Clujul Med. 91 (1) 18 - 26 2018. DOI: 10.15386/cjmed-924
14 Thomson AK Heyworth JS Girschik J Slevin T Saunders C & Fritschi L Beliefs and perceptions about the causes of breast cancer: a case-control study. BMC Res Notes. 7 558 2014. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-558
15 Breslow RA Sorkin JD Frey CM & Kessler LG Americans’ knowledge of cancer risk and survival. Prev Med. 26 (2) 170 - 177 1997. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0136
16 Wold KS Byers T Crane LA & Ahnen D What do cancer survivors believe causes cancer? (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 16 (2) 115 - 123 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-004-2414-0
17 Wang C Miller SM Egleston BL Hay JL & Weinberg DS Beliefs about the causes of breast and colorectal cancer among women in the general population. Cancer Causes Control. 21 (1) 99 - 107 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-009-9439-3
18 Raison CL & Miller AH Is depression an inflammatory disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 13 (6) 467 - 475 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s11920-011-0232-0
19 Hashmi JA Baliki MN Huang L Baria AT Torbey S Hermann KM Schnitzer TJ & Apkarian AV Shape shifting pain: chronification of back pain shifts brain representation from nociceptive to emotional circuits. Brain. 136 (Pt 9) 2751 - 2768 2013. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awt211
20 Duric V Clayton S Leong ML & Yuan LL Comorbidity factors and brain mechanisms linking chronic stress and systemic illness. Neural Plast. 2016 5460732 2016. DOI: 10.1155/2016/5460732
21 Miller GE Cohen S & Herbert TB Pathways linking major depression and immunity in ambulatory female patients. Psychosom Med. 61 (6) 850 - 860 1999. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-199911000-00021
22 Gerdin L González-Castro AM Ericson AC Persborn M Santos J Walter SA Keita ÅV Vicario M & Söderholm JD Acute psychological stress increases paracellular permeability and modulates immune activity in rectal mucosa of healthy volunteers. United European Gastroenterol J. 11 (1) 31 - 41 2023. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12329
23 La Torre D Van Oudenhove L Vanuytsel T & Verbeke K Psychosocial stress-induced intestinal permeability in healthy humans: What is the evidence. Neurobiol Stress. 27 100579 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2023.100579
24 Hilakivi-Clarke L & de Oliveira Andrade F Social isolation and breast cancer. Endocrinology. 164 (10) bqad126 2023. DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqad126
25 Andrade FO Jin L Clarke R Wood I Dutton M Anjorin C Rubin G Gao A Sengupta S FitzGerald K & Hilakivi-Clarke L Social isolation activates dormant mammary tumors, and modifies inflammatory and mitochondrial metabolic pathways in the rat mammary gland. Cells. 12 (6) 961 2023. DOI: 10.3390/cells12060961
26 Ollonen P Lehtonen J & Eskelinen M Stressful and adverse life experiences in patients with breast symptoms; a prospective case–control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res. 25 (1B) 531 - 536 2005.
27 Ollonen P Lehtonen J & Eskelinen M Anxiety, depression and the history of psychiatric symptoms in patients with breast disease: a prospective case–control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res. 25 (3C) 2527 - 2533 2005.
28 Ollonen P Lehtonen J & Eskelinen M Coping and defending as risk factors for breast cancer in patients with breast disease: a prospective case–control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res. 25 (6C) 4623 - 4630 2005.
29 Ollonen P & Eskelinen M Idealization as risk factor for breast cancer in patients with breast disease: a prospective case–control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res. 27 (3B) 1625 - 1630 2007.
30 Wirsching M Stierlin H Hoffmann F Weber G & Wirsching B Psychological identification of breast cancer patients before biopsy. J Psychosom Res. 26 (1) 1 - 10 1982. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(82)90057-5
31 Wirsching M Hoffmann F Stierlin H Weber G & Wirsching B Prebioptic psychological characteristics of breast cancer patients. Psychother Psychosom. 43 (2) 69 - 76 1985. DOI: 10.1159/000287862
32 Eskelinen M & Ollonen P Psychosocial risk scale (PRS) for breast cancer in patients with breast disease: a prospective case-control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res. 29 (11) 4765 - 4770 2009.
33 Sifneos PE Alexithymia: past and present. Am J Psychiatry. 153 (7 Suppl) 137 - 142 1996. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.153.7.137
34 Eskelinen M & Ollonen P Sifneos alexithymia questionnaire in assessment of general alexithymia in patients with breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case-control study in Finland. Anticancer Res. 31 (9) 3101 - 3106 2011.
35 Forsén A Psychosocial stress as a risk for breast cancer. Psychother Psychosom. 55 (2-4) 176 - 185 1991. DOI: 10.1159/000288427
36 Eskelinen M & Ollonen P Forsen psychological risk inventory for breast cancer patients: a prospective case-control study with special reference to the use of psychiatric medications. Anticancer Res. 31 (2) 739 - 744 2011.
37 Eskelinen M Koskela R Selander T Kaarniranta K Ollonen P & Eskelinen M Psychological stress versus outcome in patients with breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective 25-year follow-up study in patients with breast cancer symptoms. Anticancer Res. 45 (9) 3817 - 3826 2025. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17741
38 Eskelinen M & Ollonen P Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in patients with breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case–control study. In Vivo. 25 (1) 111 - 116 2011.
39 Eskelinen M Korhonen R Selander T & Ollonen P The relation of hopelessness/helplessness versus Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in healthy individuals and in patients with benign breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case-control study in Finland. Anticancer Res. 35 (2) 941 - 947 2015.
40 Eskelinen M Korhonen R Selander T & Ollonen P Beck depression inventory as a predictor of long-term outcome among patients admitted to the breast cancer diagnosis unit: a 25-year cohort study in Finland. Anticancer Res. 37 (2) 819 - 824 2017. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11383
41 Eskelinen M & Ollonen P Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) in healthy study subjects, in patients with breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case–control study. Anticancer Res. 31 (3) 1065 - 1069 2011.
42 Eskelinen M Korhonen R Selander T & Ollonen P Agreement between Hopelessness/Helplessness versus Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) in healthy individuals and in patients with benign breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case-control study in Finland. Anticancer Res. 35 (4) 2215 - 2221 2015.
43 Eskelinen M Selander T Ollonen P & Korhonen R Moderate/severe Depression (MADRS) can affect the quality of life and outcome among patients admitted to breast cancer diagnosis unit. Anticancer Res. 37 (5) 2641 - 2647 2017. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11611
44 Eskelinen M & Ollonen P Assessment of general anxiety in patients with breast disease and breast cancer using the Spielberger STAI self-evaluation test: a prospective case–control study in Finland. Anticancer Res. 31 (5) 1801 - 1806 2011.
45 Eskelinen M Koskela R Selander T Kaarniranta K Ollonen P & Eskelinen M The impact of State-trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) self-evaluation versus 25-year outcome: a prospective follow-up study in patients with breast cancer symptoms. Anticancer Res. 45 (5) 2161 - 2169 2025. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17590
46 Melink Z Lustberg MB Schnell PM Mezzanotte-Sharpe J & Orchard TS Effect of minocycline on changes in affective behaviors, cognitive function, and inflammation in breast cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapy: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 208 (3) 605 - 617 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07457-w
47 Starkweather A Kelly DL Thacker L Wright ML Jackson-Cook CK & Lyon DE Relationships among psychoneurological symptoms and levels of C-reactive protein over 2 years in women with early-stage breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 25 (1) 167 - 176 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3400-2
48 Dooley LN Ganz PA Cole SW Crespi CM & Bower JE Val66Met BDNF polymorphism as a vulnerability factor for inflammation-associated depressive symptoms in women with breast cancer. J Affect Disord. 197 43 - 50 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.059
49 Cohen M Klein E Kuten A Fried G Zinder O & Pollack S Increased emotional distress in daughters of breast cancer patients is associated with decreased natural cytotoxic activity, elevated levels of stress hormones and decreased secretion of Th1 cytokines. Int J Cancer. 100 (3) 347 - 354 2002. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10488