Open Access

A Rare Case of Femur Metastasis from Brain Meningioma

YUKI MITANI 1
TOSHIHIRO MATSUO 1
TAKASHI NISHISAKA 2
SHINJI OHBA 3
KOJI NISHIDA 1
MITSUHIRO NAKAMURA 1
RYOUSUKE MATSUSHITA 1
KANJI GOTO 1
HAYATO TATSUMI 1
  &  
NOBUO ADACHI 4

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan

2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan

3Department of Neurosurgery, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Hiroshima, Japan

4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis Sep-Oct; 5(5): 642-646 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10480
Received 23 June 2025 | Revised 24 July 2025 | Accepted 25 July 2025
Corresponding author
Yuki Mitani, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan. Tel: +81 822541818, Fax: +81 822538274, e-mail: yuki.mitani.official@gmail.com
pdf image icon

Abstract

Background/Aim
Metastases of meningiomas are infrequent, and extracranial bone involvement is extremely rare. We describe a patient with femoral metastasis originating from an atypical brain meningioma.
Case Report
A 55-year-old male had undergone five surgical procedures and Gamma Knife® radiosurgery for brain meningioma over five years. Four months after the final treatment he presented with spontaneous right-hip pain. Radiography showed a radiolucent lesion at the lesser trochanter; computed tomography confirmed cortical bone destruction. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography demonstrated abnormal uptake in the femur [Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) 3.3] and in residual intracranial tumor (SUV 9.9). Magnetic resonance imaging revealed low T1- and high T2-weighted signal intensities at the lesion. Open biopsy identified metastatic WHO grade II meningioma positive for epithelial membrane antigen and somatostatin receptor 2A, with a Ki-67 labelling index of approximately 10%. Wide resection of the proximal femur with endoprosthetic reconstruction was performed. Postoperatively, the patient experienced intracranial tumor recurrence and received radiation therapy. No local recurrence or additional metastases were observed during the three-year follow-up; the Enneking functional score was 60%.
Conclusion
We report on an extremely rare instance of metastasis to the femur in a case of atypical brain meningioma.
Keywords: Atypical meningioma, femur, bone metastasis, femoral lesion, orthopedic oncology, case report

Introduction

Meningiomas are the most common primary central nervous system neoplasms and constitute more than 30% of all intracranial tumors (1,2). Most are benign; therefore, extracranial metastases are infrequent, occurring in only 0.1% of cases (1-3). Approximately 6% of meningiomas are classified as World Health Organization (WHO) grade II (atypical), and their five-year survival rate is 68.8% (4,5). The most frequent site of extracranial metastasis is the lung, whereas bone involvement is rare (6-8). We report an extremely rare instance of metastasis to the femur in a patient with atypical (grade II) meningioma.

Case Report

A 55-year-old male with a history of multiple surgeries and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brain meningioma over five years presented to our hospital with spontaneous right-hip pain, which began four months after his final treatment. On physical examination, there was no redness or local heat, but tenderness and hip motion pain were present. Radiographic examination (X-ray) revealed a radiolucent area at the lesser trochanter (Figure 1). Computed tomography (CT) showed cortical bone thinning and destruction at the lesser trochanter (Figure 2). Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) demonstrated abnormal uptake in the brain meningioma and right proximal femur with a Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) of 3.3 at the lesser trochanter and 9.9 at the meningioma (Figure 3). The Mirels score (9), used to assess the risk of pathological fracture, was 9 (Site: 3, Nature: 3, Size: 1, Pain: 2). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images at the lesser trochanter (Figure 4, Figure 5). An open biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of femur metastasis originating from a grade II brain meningioma. Histopathological analysis revealed the proliferation of tumor cells resembling meningocytes in a sheet-like or partially whorled pattern (Figure 6). The nuclei of the tumor cells were oval to round, with nuclear enlargement and pleomorphism. Mitotic figures were observed at approximately 1 per high-power field (HPF, ×400) (Figure 7). Immunohistochemistry showed that the neoplastic cells were positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and somatostatin receptor 2A (SSTR2A), and the Ki-67 labeling index (L.I.) was approximately 10%. We performed wide resection of the tumor and prosthetic replacement of the femur. Postoperatively, the patient experienced recurrence in the brain meningioma and received radiation therapy. However, there was no local recurrence or metastasis observed in other sites except brain 3 years postoperatively, and the Enneking functional evaluation score (10) was 60%.

Discussion

Meningioma is one of the most common benign tumors of the central nervous system. Extracranial metastases from meningiomas are very rare (1-3). The most common metastatic site is the lung, followed by the liver and regional lymph nodes, while bone is considered a rare site of metastasis (6-8). Spinal and sacrum metastases are the most frequently reported bony metastases (6-8,11-15). To the best of our knowledge, there have been no report of metastasis to the femur without other metastasis, as seen in this patient.

Multiple treatments for local recurrence may cause metastasis of atypical meningioma (16). The interval between the first treatment and metastasis to the bone can vary from three to 168 months, indicating a wide range in the time course of metastatic progression in patients with meningioma (17,18). Previous reports indicate that the interval is shorter in patients with high-grade meningioma (grade II, III) (mean 24.5±16.3 months) compared to those with low-grade meningioma (grade I) (mean 98.3±12.7 months) (16,19). Recently, we experienced metastasis to the sternum from the atypical meningioma (grade II) in a patient who underwent surgery and gamma-knife treatment for grade II brain meningioma over 31 years (20). Although the metastatic progression of high-grade meningioma varies significantly across reports, the duration of this case was extremely long compared to the typical time course. Therefore, long-term follow-up may be necessary to identify metastases even in patients with high-grade meningioma. In this case, the patient underwent surgery and gamma-knife treatment for grade II brain meningioma over 5 years and suffered from spontaneous right hip pain four months after the final treatment. It took approximately five years from the start of treatment to the onset of metastasis, which is considered relatively long for a grade II meningioma.

The treatment for high-grade meningioma involves surgical resection and focal radiation, depending on the complexity of the individual case. There is no established therapy for metastatic meningiomas (21,22). The role of chemotherapy for recurrence remains inconclusive in the literature (15,23). Although radiotherapy and chemotherapy are sometimes used for treating metastases of brain meningiomas tumor resection was chosen in this case due to the risk of pathological fracture, according to Mirels score. In this case, bone metastasis occurred during long-term treatment for primary meningioma over five years. This case suggests that long-term follow-up of meningioma treatment may reveal potential for bone metastasis.

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

Authors’ Contributions

YM, TM, OS, KN, MN, RM, KG and HT performed the surgeries and clinical treatments. TN, YM, TM, OS, KN, MN, RM, KG and HT analyzed the pathology and clinical course. YM, TM and TN took the lead in drafting the manuscript, with support from SO, KN, MN, RM, KG and HT. All authors discussed the clinical results, critically reviewed the report, commented on successive drafts and approved the final manuscript. NA supervised the findings of this case and helped to draft the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank the orthopedic oncology nursing team of Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

No generative AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.

References

1 Toland A Huntoon K & Dahiya SM Meningioma: a pathology perspective. Neurosurgery. 89(1) 11 - 21 2021. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab001
2 Kessler RA Garzon-Muvdi T Yang W Weingart J Olivi A Huang J Brem H & Lim M Metastatic atypical and anaplastic meningioma: a case series and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 101 47 - 56 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.070
3 Enam SA Abdulrauf S Mehta B Malik GM & Mahmood A Metastasis in meningioma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 138(10) 1172 - 1177 1996. DOI: 10.1007/BF01809747
4 Brem SS Bierman PJ Brem H Butowski N Chamberlain MC Chiocca EA DeAngelis LM Fenstermaker RA Friedman A Gilbert MR Hesser D Junck L Linette GP Loeffler JS Maor MH Michael M Moots PL Morrison T Mrugala M Nabors LB Newton HB Portnow J Raizer JJ Recht L Shrieve DC Sills AK Jr Vrionis FD Wen PY & National Comprehensive Cancer Network Central nervous system cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 9(4) 352 - 400 2011. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0036
5 Recker MJ Kuo CC Prasad D Attwood K & Plunkett RJ Incidence trends and survival analysis of atypical meningiomas: a population-based study from 2004 to 2018. J Neurooncol. 160(1) 13 - 22 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04085-6
6 Fabi A Nuzzo C Vidiri A Ciccarese M Felici A Cattani F & Cognetti F Bone and lung metastases from intracranial meningioma. Anticancer Res. 26(5B) 3835 - 3837 2006.
7 Ward AL Risman A Segar S Sharma S & Vender JR Atypical intracranial meningioma with metastasis to c7 vertebral body: a case report. World Neurosurg. 122 593 - 598 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.067
8 Frydrychowicz C Holland H Hantmann H Gradistanac T Hoffmann KT Mueller W Meixensberger J & Krupp W Two cases of atypical meningioma with pulmonary metastases: A comparative cytogenetic analysis of chromosomes 1p and 22 and a review of the literature. Neuropathology. 35(2) 175 - 183 2015. DOI: 10.1111/neup.12177
9 Damron TA Morgan H Prakash D Grant W Aronowitz J & Heiner J Critical evaluation of Mirels’ rating system for impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (415 Suppl) S201 - S207 2003. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093842.72468.73
10 Enneking WF Dunham W Gebhardt MC Malawar M & Pritchard DJ A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (286) 241 - 246 1993.
11 Hirai S Nobuto H Yokota K Matsuura Y Uegami S Sato K Mitsui N Sugita T & Hamanaka Y Surgical resection and reconstruction for primary malignant sternal tumor. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 15(3) 182 - 185 2009.
12 Olson PN Mitchell SL Goswitz J & Griffiths HJ Case report 853. Meningioma metastatic to the spine. Skeletal Radiol. 23(5) 405 - 407 1994. DOI: 10.1007/BF02417004
13 Palmer JD Cook PL & Ellison DW Extracranial osseous metastases from intracranial meningioma. Br J Neurosurg. 8(2) 215 - 218 1994. DOI: 10.3109/02688699409027971
14 Pinsker MO Buhl R Hugo HH & Mehdorn HM Metastatic meningioma WHO Grade II of the cervical spine: case report and review of the literature. Zentralbl Neurochir. 66(01) 35 - 38 2005. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-836245
15 Paix A Waissi W Antoni D Adeduntan R & Noël G Visceral and bone metastases of a WHO grade 2 meningioma: A case report and review of the literature. Cancer Radiother. 21(1) 55 - 59 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.09.012
16 Singh R Ryan C Chohan MO Tisnado J Hadjigeorgiou GF & Bilsky MH Intracranial meningioma with vertebral or intraspinal metastasis: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine. 25(6) 775 - 781 2016. DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.SPINE151457
17 Chamberlain MC & Glantz MJ Cerebrospinal fluid‐disseminated meningioma. Cancer. 103(7) 1427 - 1430 2005. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20926
18 Chuang HC Lee HC & Cho DY Intracranial malignant meningioma with multiple spinal metastases—a case report and literature review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 31(26) E1006 - E1010 2006. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245952.71265.9b
19 Liu Y Li J Duan Y Ye Y Xiao L & Mao R Subcutaneous metastasis of atypical meningioma: case report and literature review. World Neurosurg. 138 182 - 186 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.128
20 Matsumura S Matsuo T Hirai S Katayama T Nishisaka T Tominaga A Shinbo K Mochizuki YU Nishida K Nakamura M Matsushita R Kawaguchi S & Adachi N Sternal metastasis of brain meningioma – a case report. Anticancer Res. 41(8) 4039 - 4043 2021. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15204
21 Surov A Gottschling S Bolz J Kornhuber M Alfieri A Holzhausen H Abbas J & Kösling S Distant metastases in meningioma: an underestimated problem. J Neurooncol. 112(3) 323 - 327 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1074-x
22 Forest F Berremila S Gyenes C Ginguéné C Kassir R Sulaiman A Pasquier B Porcheron J & Péoc’h M Metastatic meningiomas: an unusual clinical and pathological diagnosis with highly variable outcome. J Neurooncol. 120(2) 411 - 421 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1567-2
23 Dalle Ore CL Magill ST Yen AJ Shahin MN Lee DS Lucas CG Chen WC Viner JA Aghi MK Theodosopoulos PV Raleigh DR Villanueva-Meyer JE & McDermott MW Meningioma metastases: incidence and proposed screening paradigm. J Neurosurg. 132(5) 1447 - 1455 2020. DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.JNS181771