1Department of Surgery, Sasebo Chuo Hospital, Sasebo, Japan
2Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
3Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, Sasebo, Japan
4Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan
5Department of Surgery, Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
Jul-Aug;
5(4):
478-484
DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10461
Received 30 April 2025 |
Revised 16 May 2025 | Accepted 19 May 2025
Corresponding author
Tetsuro Tominaga, Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan. Tel: +81 958197304, Fax: +81 958197306, e-mail:
tetsuro.tominaga@nagasaki-u.ac.jp
Abstract
Background/Aim
The standard treatment for local recurrence (LR) is radical resection where possible, and R0 resection is reportedly associated with improved prognosis. However, the surgery for LR is complex and difficult, resulting in a low resection rate of 13-23%. The aim of this study was to examine clinical characteristics of LR and survival outcome after R0 resection of LR.
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 18 patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer LR at four hospitals between April 2016 and March 2024. We examined the perioperative outcomes and prognosis of LR treated with R0 resection.
Results
Pathological T4 was seen in 9 of 18 patients (50.0%), N-positive status in 12 (66.7%), and lymphovascular invasion in 15 (83.3%). Median interval from primary surgery to local recurrence was 24 months. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients (50.0%). Eight patients (44.4%) experienced re-recurrence, with peritoneal metastasis in 5 patients, liver metastasis in one, lung metastasis in one, and adrenal gland metastasis in one. Five-year RFS was 39.4% and 5-year OS was 52.2%.
Conclusion
Postoperative LR of colorectal cancer is expected to show relatively favorable prognosis with R0 resection. LR often occurs within 3 years, and careful follow-up is necessary for high-risk cases.
Keywords:
Colorectal cancer, local recurrence, R0 resection, overall survival, recurrence-free survival
Introduction
Local recurrence (LR) of colorectal cancer is rare. In Europe, approximately 70% of cases are considered unresectable or untreatable at the time of discovery (1). With recent improvements in standardized surgical procedures and perioperative treatment, the rate of LR after colon cancer resection has been lowered to approximately 4% (2,3) from over 10% (4-6).
The standard treatment for LR is radical resection if possible, and R0 resection has been reported to improve prognosis (7). However, surgeries for LR are complex and difficult due to the location and infiltration into surrounding tissues, resulting in a low resection rate of 13-23% (7,8). The 5-year survival rate ranges from 6% to 67%, and the re-recurrence rate ranges from 4% to 54%, showing significant variation (9,10). Due to the low incidence, few reports have examined the clinical characteristics and prognosis of LR.
The aim of multicenter study was to examine clinical characteristics of LR and survival outcome after R0 resection of LR.
Patients and Methods
Patient selection. This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 18 patients who underwent curative surgery for LR of colorectal cancer at four hospitals in Japan (Nagasaki University Hospital, Sasebo City General Hospital, Nagasaki Medical Center, and Ureshino Medical Center) between April 2016 and March 2024. The study was approved by the institutional review board of each participating institution, and the need to obtain informed consent was waived based on the retrospective design. The ethics approval number is 16062715-5.
LR definition and data collection. LR was defined as a histologically confirmed recurrence localized in the primary bed, in an area without peritoneum. LR was classified as high retroperitoneal recurrence above the level of the inferior mesenteric artery, incisional recurrence on the incision scar in the abdominal wall, low retroperitoneal recurrence below the level of the inferior mesenteric artery, and pelvic recurrence below the promontory.
The following data were collected: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, comorbidities, location of primary tumor, T factor of primary tumor, N factor of primary tumor, histological type, lymphovascular invasion, postoperative complications after primary surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy after primary surgery, interval from primary surgery to LR, neoadjuvant treatment for LR, surgical approach to LR, surgical procedure for LR, multivisceral resection, operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications after LR surgery, hospital stay, and adjuvant chemotherapy after LR surgery. Postoperative complications were defined as complications occurring within 30 days of the primary surgery and were recorded and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
Statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using JMP software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Continuous data are presented as mean (range) and categorical data as counts and percentages. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. All p-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients and primary tumor are shown in Table I. The 18 patients included 10 women (55.6%), and median BMI was 22.7 kg/m2. Comorbidities were present in 10 patients (55.6%). The histopathological diagnosis was rectal cancer in 10 cases (55.6%) and colon cancer in 8 cases (44.4%). Clinical grade was T4 in 9 cases (50.0%), clinical N-positive status was seen in 12 cases (66.7%), and differentiation was defined as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma/signet ring cell carcinoma in 4 cases (22.2%). Lymphovascular invasion was seen in 15 cases (83.3%) and postoperative complications after primary surgery were identified in 3 cases (16.7%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 8 patients (44.4%)
The perioperative characteristics of LR surgery are shown in Table II. The median interval from primary surgery to local recurrence was 24 months. Ten patients (55.6%) received neoadjuvant treatment for local recurrence, 11 patients (61.1%) received laparoscopic surgery and 2 (11.1%) received robotic surgery. Multivisceral resection was needed in 6 patients (33.3%), median operation time was 361 min, median blood loss was 180 ml. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2) after LR surgery occurred in 9 patients (50.0%) and severe complication occurred one patient. The median hospital stay was 17 days, and adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of LR was given to 5 patients (27.8%). Eight patients (44.4%) experienced re-recurrence, comprising peritoneal metastasis in 5 patients, liver metastasis in one, lung metastasis in one, and adrenal gland metastasis in one.
Figure 1 shows survival analysis after LR surgery. The 5-year RFS rate was 39.4% and the 5-year OS rate was 52.2%. No significant differences between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy after LR resection and those who did not were seen in either RFS rate (50.0% vs. 44.4%, respectively; p=0.526) or OS rate (50.0% vs. 42.8%, respectively; p=0.915).
Discussion
Several reports have discussed the risks associated with LR in colorectal cancer patients (11-13). Common risk factors for colorectal cancer include pathological T factor, N factor, and lymphovascular invasion (14,15). In rectal cancer, locally advanced cancer, lower rectal cancer, and positive circumferential resection margin have been reported as a risk factors (16). In this study, T4 cases accounted for half of all LR cases. Pathological N-positive cases were also numerous. Lymphovascular invasion was observed in more than 80% of cases, and two cases (11.1%) were CRM-positive, consistent with previous reports.
Intraoperative perforation and postoperative anastomotic leakage have also been considered risk factors for LR during the perioperative period (16-20). Waldeschtdt et al. reported that 79% of patients with LR experienced intraoperative adverse events, compared to 53% of patients without LR (16). In this study, no intraoperative complications such as intestinal perforation were observed. Anastomotic leakage was noted in 2 cases (11.1%) where the primary tumor was resected at a shallow depth. Further large-scale studies are needed to clarify the impact of perioperative adverse events on LR.
Regarding the period from colorectal cancer surgery to LR, 95% of patients reportedly experienced LR within 3 years (15,21). According to Yun et al., 20% of patients experienced LR within 1 year, 60% within 2 years, and 82% within 3 years (11). In addition, Dumon et al. reported that the median period from primary surgery to LR was 24.1 months. Patients at high risk for LR thus require careful follow-up for at least 3 years.
The surgery for LR is often complex, with a resection rate of approximately 13-23% (7,8). Complete resection contributes to a favorable prognosis, but this often requires multiorgan resection, and the incidence of postoperative complications in LR surgery is also high (22). Previous reports have indicated an overall complication rate of 53.3%, with severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurring in 16% of cases (22). In addition, a mortality rate of 2.6% has been reported (22). In our study, the postoperative complication rate was 50%, similar to previous reports, but only one case (5.5%) was classified as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3. No deaths were observed within 30 days in this study. This may be due to the absence of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy cases with a high incidence of complications compared to previous reports (22), and the fact that more than half of the cases were treated with minimally invasive surgery.
Reports on the prognosis following R0 resection of LR have been limited. Iversen et al. reported a 3-year survival rate of 61% and a 3-year disease-free survival rate of 41%, both of which were considered favorable (23). Regarding recurrence patterns after LR, 50% of re-recurrences were distant metastases, 21% were LR, and the remaining 29% involved both local and distant metastases. Dumont et al. examined 75 patients who underwent radical resection of LR following colorectal cancer. The 5-year survival rate was 37.5%, and the 5-year local recurrence rate was 38.8% (22). In the present study, the 5-year survival rate was 52.2% and the 5-year RFS was 39.4%, representing relatively favorable results. Recurrence was observed in 44% of cases, and 62% of these cases had peritoneal metastasis. Local control was relatively good, but many cases experienced recurrence.
Previous reports have indicated recurrence rates after multimodal therapy for LR from 4% to 54% (10). In the present study, no difference in prognosis was observed between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy after R0 resection and those who did not. However, the number of cases was small, and further large-scale trials are needed to evaluate perioperative treatment strategies.
Study limitations. First, it is a retrospective study based on the medical records of the patients. Second, although it is a multicenter study, we evaluated a small number of patients. Third, the timing of surgery for LR was left to the discretion of the surgeon.
Conclusion
Postoperative LR of colorectal cancer can be expected to show a relatively favorable prognosis with R0 resection. LR often occurs within 3 years, and careful follow-up is necessary for high-risk cases.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Authors’ Contributions
Keizaburo Maruyama and Tetsuro Tominaga mainly designed the study. Takashi Nonaka, Yuma Takamura, Hiroki Katayama, Shintaro Hashimoto, Mariko Yamashita, Keisuke Noda, Rika Ono, Mitsutoshi Ishii, Makoto Hisanaga, Kaido Oishi, and Fumitake Uchida performed surgery. Keitaro Matsumoto supervised this study.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure
No artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including large language models or machine learning software, were used in the preparation, analysis, or presentation of this manuscript.
References
1
Elferink MA
,
Visser O
,
Wiggers T
,
Otter R
,
Tollenaar RA
,
Langendijk JA
&
Siesling S
. Prognostic factors for locoregional recurrences in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol.
19(7)
2203
- 2211
2012.
DOI:
10.1245/s10434-011-2183-4
2
Liska D
,
Stocchi L
,
Karagkounis G
,
Elagili F
,
Dietz DW
,
Kalady MF
,
Kessler H
,
Remzi FH
&
Church J
. Incidence, patterns, and predictors of locoregional recurrence in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol.
24(4)
1093
- 1099
2017.
DOI:
10.1245/s10434-016-5643-z
3
Read TE
,
Mutch MG
,
Chang BW
,
McNevin MS
,
Fleshman JW
,
Birnbaum EH
,
Fry RD
,
Caushaj PF
&
Kodner IJ
. Locoregional recurrence and survival after curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon. J Am Coll Surg.
195(1)
33
- 40
2002.
DOI:
10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01224-3
4
Heald RJ
,
Husband EM
&
Ryall RD
. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence. Journal of British Surgery.
69(10)
613
- 616
1982.
DOI:
10.1002/bjs.1800691019
5
Yun JA
,
Huh JW
,
Kim HC
,
Park YA
,
Cho YB
,
Yun SH
,
Lee WY
&
Chun HK
. Local recurrence after curative resection for rectal carcinoma: The role of surgical resection. Medicine (Baltimore).
95(27)
e3942
2016.
DOI:
10.1097/MD.0000000000003942
6
Conroy T
,
Bosset JF
,
Etienne PL
,
Rio E
,
François É
,
Mesgouez-Nebout N
,
Vendrely V
,
Artignan X
,
Bouché O
,
Gargot D
,
Boige V
,
Bonichon-Lamichhane N
,
Louvet C
,
Morand C
,
de la Fouchardière C
,
Lamfichekh N
,
Juzyna B
,
Jouffroy-Zeller C
,
Rullier E
,
Marchal F
,
Gourgou S
,
Castan F
,
Borg C
&
Unicancer Gastrointestinal Group and Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive (PRODIGE) Group
. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol.
22(5)
702
- 715
2021.
DOI:
10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00079-6
7
Bowne WB
,
Lee B
,
Wong DW
,
Ben-Porat L
,
Shia J
,
Cohen AM
,
Enker WE
,
Guillem JG
,
Paty PB
&
Weiser MR
. Operative salvage for locoregional recurrent colon cancer after curative resection: an analysis of 100 cases. Dis Colon Rectum.
48(5)
897
- 909
2005.
DOI:
10.1007/s10350-004-0881-8
8
Hahnloser D
,
Nelson H
,
Gunderson LL
,
Hassan I
,
Haddock MG
,
O’Connell MJ
,
Cha S
,
Sargent DJ
&
Horgan A
. Curative potential of multimodality therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Ann Surg.
237(4)
502
- 508
2003.
DOI:
10.1097/01.SLA.0000059972.90598.5F
9
Courtney D
,
McDermott F
,
Heeney A
&
Winter DC
. Clinical review: surgical management of locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg.
399(1)
33
- 40
2014.
DOI:
10.1007/s00423-013-1134-x
10
Nielsen MB
,
Laurberg S
&
Holm T
. Current management of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis.
13(7)
732
- 742
2011.
DOI:
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02167.x
11
Yun HR
,
Lee LJ
,
Park JH
,
Cho YK
,
Cho YB
,
Lee WY
,
Kim HC
,
Chun HK
&
Yun SH
. Local recurrence after curative resection in patients with colon and rectal cancers. Int J Colorectal Dis.
23(11)
1081
- 1087
2008.
DOI:
10.1007/s00384-008-0530-0
12
Enríquez-Navascués JM
,
Borda N
,
Lizerazu A
,
Placer C
,
Elosegui JL
,
Ciria JP
,
Lacasta A
&
Bujanda L
. Patterns of local recurrence in rectal cancer after a multidisciplinary approach. World J Gastroenterol.
17(13)
1674
- 1684
2011.
DOI:
10.3748/wjg.v17.i13.1674
13
Jung WB
,
Yu CS
,
Lim SB
,
Park IJ
,
Yoon YS
&
Kim JC
. Anastomotic recurrence after curative resection for colorectal cancer. World J Surg.
41(1)
285
- 294
2017.
DOI:
10.1007/s00268-016-3663-2
14
Harris GJ
,
Church JM
,
Senagore AJ
,
Lavery IC
,
Hull TL
,
Strong SA
&
Fazio VW
. Factors affecting local recurrence of colonic adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum.
45(8)
1029
- 1034
2002.
DOI:
10.1007/s10350-004-6355-1
15
Kraemer M
,
Wiratkapun S
,
Seow-Choen F
,
Ho YH
,
Eu KW
&
Nyam D
. Stratifying risk factors for follow-up: a comparison of recurrent and nonrecurrent colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum.
44(6)
815
- 821
2001.
DOI:
10.1007/BF02234700
16
Waldenstedt S
,
Bock D
,
Haglind E
,
Sjöberg B
&
Angenete E
. Intraoperative adverse events as a risk factor for local recurrence of rectal cancer after resection surgery. Colorectal Dis.
24(4)
449
- 460
2022.
DOI:
10.1111/codi.16036
17
Sung S
,
Kim SH
,
Lee JH
,
Nam TK
,
Jeong S
,
Jang HS
,
Song JH
,
Lee JW
,
Bae JM
&
Lee JH
. Continuous effect of radial resection margin on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients who receive preoperative chemoradiation and curative surgery: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
98(3)
647
- 653
2017.
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.008
18
Trakarnsanga A
,
Gonen M
,
Shia J
,
Goodman KA
,
Nash GM
,
Temple LK
,
Guillem JG
,
Paty PB
,
Garcia-Aguilar J
&
Weiser MR
. What is the significance of the circumferential margin in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol.
20(4)
1179
- 1184
2013.
DOI:
10.1245/s10434-012-2722-7
19
Matsuda A
,
Kishi T
,
Musso G
,
Matsutani T
,
Yokoi K
,
Wang P
&
Uchida E
. The effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol.
20(3)
856
- 863
2013.
DOI:
10.1245/s10434-012-2660-4
20
Zhou C
,
Ren Y
,
Li J
,
Wang K
,
He J
,
Chen W
&
Liu P
. Association between irrigation fluids, washout volumes and risk of local recurrence of anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 427 cases and 492 controls. PLoS One.
9(5)
e95699
2014.
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0095699
21
Obrand DI
&
Gordon PH
. Incidence and patterns of recurrence following curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum.
40(1)
15
- 24
1997.
DOI:
10.1007/BF02055676
22
Dumont F
,
Loaec C
,
Wernert R
,
Maurel B
,
Thibaudeau E
&
Vilcot L
. Surgery of resectable local recurrence following colorectal cancer: Compartmental surgery improves local control. J Surg Oncol.
126(6)
1048
- 1057
2022.
DOI:
10.1002/jso.26990
23
Iversen H
,
Martling A
,
Johansson H
,
Nilsson PJ
&
Holm T
. Pelvic local recurrence from colorectal cancer: surgical challenge with changing preconditions. Colorectal Dis.
20(5)
399
- 406
2018.
DOI:
10.1111/codi.13966