Open Access

A Rare Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Spleen: A Case Report

DIMITRIS FAGKREZOS 1
MARINA KAKAVELOU 2
EVGENIA CHARITAKI 3
SPIROS DELIS 3
KLEO PAPAPARASKEVA 4
CHARIKLEIA TRIANTOPOULOU 5
PETROS MANIATIS 1
DIMOSTHENIS CHRYSIKOS 2
  &  
THEODORE TROUPIS 2

1Computed Tomography Department, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece

2Department of Anatomy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

3Surgery Department, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece

4Pathology Department, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece

5Radiology Department, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece

Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis May-June; 4(3): 379-383 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10335
Received 08 February 2024 | Revised 10 December 2024 | Accepted 07 March 2024
Corresponding author
Marina Kakavelou, Department of Anatomy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 35 Kasou, Keratsini, 18758 Attiki, Greece. Tel: +30 6980663836, email: kakavelmn@gmail.com
pdf image icon

Abstract

: Background/Aim: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are rare, solid, potentially malignant lesions of uncertain etiology. Histologically, IMTs exhibit a combination of lymphocytes and inflammatory cells within a fibroblastic myxoid layer. The diagnosis of IMTs poses a challenge for various medical specialties, including surgeons, pathologists, and oncologists, due to their non-specific clinical presentation. Furthermore, radiologists face difficulties in interpreting computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results, which often yield polymorphic and inconclusive findings. Ultimately, histopathologists play a crucial role in reaching a definitive diagnosis based on the tumor's histological characteristics. They are detected in every system of the human body, most commonly in the lungs. Here, we report an uncommon occurrence of IMT in the spleen of a patient with nonspecific abdominal pain. : Case Report: A 56-year-old Caucasian female presented to Konstantopouleio General Hospital of Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece, with abdominal pain and discomfort. The patient had no significant medical history and normal laboratory tests. An abdominal CT revealed a large mass in the spleen. A splenectomy was performed. Histopathological analysis of the tumor revealed IMTS. : Conclusion: Splenic IMT is a rare benign tumor with moderate malignant potential. It lacks a distinct clinical presentation and is typically identified either incidentally or during the examination of abdominal pain.
Keywords: Spleen, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, oncology, nonspecific abdominal pain, pseudotumor

Inflammatory pseudotumors are more prevalent among the pediatric and young adult populations (1,2). Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are uncommon neoplasms, which can manifest in every site of the human body, mainly in the lung and orbit. Their composition consists of a combination of plasma cells and/or lymphocytes within a spindle cellular myxoid stroma. The complex and variable histology of these tumors has led to alternative names, such as IMT, plasma cell granuloma, xanthomatous pseudotumor, postinflammatory tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic proliferation, myofibro-blastoma, and pseudosarcomatous myofibroblastic proliferation, due to their complex and variable histology (3).

Clinical presentation varies, ranging from asymptomatic in smaller solitary masses to symptomatic in larger pseudotumors, with signs and symptoms depending on tumor location or nonspecific systemic symptoms. The preferred treatment is a complete surgical resection of the tumor (4,5). Here, we present a rare case of an IMT of the spleen in a patient with nonspecific abdominal pain, and a free medical history. The patient provided written informed consent for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Case Report

A 56-year-old Caucasian woman with a free medical record presented to the hospital complaining of abdominal pain in the left hypochondrium and discomfort. Clinical examination revealed mild tenderness in the left hypochondrium. To investigate the cause of the abdominal pain, laboratory tests and an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan were employed. Laboratory tests were normal. However, the CT scan with intravenous contrast depicted a large mass in the spleen. As shown in Figure 1, the CT scan depicts an ill-defined almost isoattenuated area of the spleen in the pre-contrast images. Following the intravenous contrast agent administration during the arterial phase, the CT revealed a distinct hypoattenuated lesion within the spleen parenchyma (Figure 2). Subsequently, as indicated in Figure 3, in the portal phase, cystic necrotic lesions were observed within this hypoattenuated area.

The patient underwent a splenectomy, and biopsies were taken. Histopathological analysis of the tumor revealed an IMT.

The spleen was mildly enlarged, weighing 437 g and measuring 13.5×7×9.6 cm. The obtained sections revealed a subcapsular, well-defined, and subrounded structure measuring 7.1×6.9×6 cm, displaying a whitish-green hue and localized necrotic areas (Figure 4). No macroscopic abnormalities were observed in the remaining splenic parenchyma.

Specifically, the histopathological examination unveiled a partially encapsulated lesion with a combination of mesenchymal and inflammatory components. The predominant inflammatory cells comprised lymphocytes and plasma cells, with notable presence of eosinophils, along with fewer mast cells and neutrophils. The mesenchymal component consisted of spindle cells that were arranged in more distinct short and thin bundles intersecting at acute angles (Figure 5). These spindle cells were mixed with inflammatory cells and showed a moderate amount of fibrillar cytoplasm and mild nuclear atypia, as illustrated in Figure 6.

Several regions of necrosis, constituting less than 15% of the total lesion area, and a few microabscesses were detected. The mitotic count in the most active areas was 2/10 High Power Fields (HPF) without atypical forms. No acid-fast bacilli were identified on the Ziehl-Neelsen stain. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that mesenchymal cells exhibiting a myofibroblastic phenotype tested positive for smooth muscle actin (SMA) and Vimentin (Figure 7), and negative for epithelial (AE1/AE3), myogenic (desmin, caldesmon), Langerhans cell (S100, CD1a), histiocytic (CD68), dendritic cell (CD23), and endothelial (CD34, CD31, FVIII) markers. No immunoreactivity to ALK was observed.

Discussion

IMT was first described in the lungs by Brunn, who initially termed it an inflammatory pseudotumor. Other names used to describe IMT according to the international literature are IMT, plasma cell granuloma, xanthomatous pseudotumor, postinflammatory tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic proliferation, myofibroblastoma, and pseudosarcomatous myofibroblastic proliferation (3,6). However, the term 'inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor' is the official term for its description (7).

IMT is frequently observed in pediatric and adolescent populations. IMT occurs primarily in the lungs, but also in extrapulmonary sites throughout the body, with the most common being the liver, heart, orbit, central nervous system, and retroperitoneum (8-12).

The underlying pathophysiological mechanism remains unidentified. Possible pathogenic mechanisms for IMT include infections, trauma, previous surgeries, and chromosomal abnormalities, such as those involving the ALK gene (13-17). Viral infections caused by HIV, HHV 8, and EBV are known to be linked to the development of IMT (18-20). EBV RNA was detected in nearly 40% of the overall patient population. In these cases, IMT is usually detected in the spleen or liver, characterized by the presence of infected spindle-shaped cells, which are more likely to exhibit follicular dendritic markers rather than myofibroblastic markers.

The typical symptoms encountered by patients with IMT, such as pain, anemia, fatigue, and weight loss, mirror those of many malignancies. Thus, the differential diagnosis of IMT primarily encompasses other solid malignancies and poses challenges due to their comparable clinical presentations. CT scan and MRI are useful tools in the investigation of abdominal pain. In conclusion, the diagnosis of IMTs primarily relies on histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations.

On the CT scan, the mass appears as an ill-circumscribed hypoattenuated lesion, calcified or noncalcified, and exhibits mild enhancement. Following the administration of contrast medium, a diverse range of patterns becomes apparent. In the delayed phase, there may be a peripheral area displaying an iso- or hyperattenuated pattern (21,22). Cellular elements are visualized on CT as hypoechoic and low-attenuated, while inflammatory elements are hypoattenuated (22). In our patient, the tumor exhibited cellular characteristics, resulting in hypodensity compared to the surrounding normal splenic parenchyma.

On Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), IMT typically presents as a well-defined splenic mass exhibiting T1 iso- or hypo-intensity, while the T2 signal varies depending on the cellular content and presence of fibrotic elements, resulting in hyperintensity or hypointensity, respectively. In gadolinium-enhanced images, the lesion demonstrates early peripheral arterial enhancement, a low central stellate T2 signal, and delayed progressive enhancement. These findings are widely considered to strongly indicate the presence of IMT.

IMT consists of spindle-shaped cells with myofibroblastic features intermingled with inflammatory cells, such as plasma cells, lymphocytes, and eosinophils (6). ΙMT is classified into three distinct histopathological subcategories: xanthogranuloma, plasma granuloma, and sclerosing pseudoplasm. Each lesion may present a combination of these three subtypes (21).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is considered a useful tool to confirm the diagnosis. There are three histological patterns of IMTs, according to Coffin et al.: A myxoid vascular pattern, a low-cellularity collagenous arrangement, and a dense arrangement of spindle cells organized in either a fascicular or storiform pattern (7).

IMT is classified as a benign neoplasm with moderate biologic potential (6,23). The assessment of its aggressiveness is particularly important in determining the most appropriate treatment. The aggressiveness of IMTs is determined by location, multinodularity, and proximity to vital structures. Studies suggest that tumors of the abdomen and retroperitoneum show the most aggressive behavior (24). In cases of malignant transformation, the IMT shows prominent, vesicular nuclei with mitosis. In our case, no atypical cells or mitosis were detected, and after a one-year follow-up, no metastases or local infiltration occurred.

The primary treatment approach typically involves a complete resection of the tumor. Systemic administration of corticosteroids can also lead to tumor regression (25). In cases of metastatic disease or where the IMT cannot be completely resected, chemotherapy is recommended. However, there is no definitive data on the effectiveness of chemotherapy. A total splenectomy was performed in our case.

Conclusion

IMTs are rare, solid tumors that can be found in any organ of the body. Their symptoms vary. They may appear asymptomatic, symptomatic associated with mass effect, or non-specific systemic symptoms. Their diagnosis is difficult and is not based on imaging tests since they cannot be differentiated from other entities, such as malignancies. Their final diagnosis is established by histological examinations. Their course is uncertain, although they are benign tumors of intermediate biological potential. The treatment of choice is their complete excision.

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors assert that they do not have any conflicting interests in relation to this study.

Authors’ Contributions

FD and KM were the primary contributors to drafting the manuscript. KM is corresponding author. DS and CE conducted the surgical treatment. PK conducted the histopathological examination of the specimen. TC, CD, TT, and MP reviewed and endorsed the final version of the manuscript. All Authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study received no funding.

References

1 Karnak I Senocak ME Ciftci AO Cağlar M Bingöl-Koloğlu M Tanyel FC & Büyükpamukçu N Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in children: Diagnosis and treatment. J Pediatr Surg. 36(6) 908 - 912 2001. DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.23970
2 Park SB Cho K Kim JK Lee JH Jeong AK Kwon WJ & Kim HH Inflammatory pseudotumor (myoblastic tumor) of the genitourinary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 191(4) 1255 - 1262 2008. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3663
3 Patnana M Sevrukov AB Elsayes KM Viswanathan C Lubner M & Menias CO Inflammatory pseudotumor: the great mimicker. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198(3) W217 - W227 2012. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7288
4 Kovach SJ Fischer AC Katzman PJ Salloum RM Ettinghausen SE Madeb R & Koniaris LG Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. J Surg Oncol. 94(5) 385 - 391 2006. DOI: 10.1002/jso.20516
5 Sakai M Ikeda H Suzuki N Takahashi A Kuroiwa M Hirato J Hatakeyama S & Tsuchida Y Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: Case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg. 36(4) 663 - 666 2001. DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22316
6 Coffin CM Watterson J Priest JR & Dehner LP Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor) a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 19(8) 859 - 872 1995. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199508000-00001
7 Brunn H Two interesting benign lung tumors of contradictory histopathology. J Thorac Surg. 9(2) 119 - 131 1939. DOI: 10.1016/S0096-5588(20)32030-4
8 Jeon YK Chang KH Suh YL Jung HW & Park SH Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the central nervous system: clinicopathologic analysis of 10 cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 64(3) 254 - 259 2005. DOI: 10.1093/jnen/64.3.254
9 Attili SV Chandra CR Hemant DK Bapsy PP RamaRao C & Anupama G Retroperitoneal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. World J Surg Oncol. 3 66 2005. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-3-66
10 Tang L Lai EC Cong WM Li AJ Fu SY Pan ZY Zhou WP Lau WY & Wu MC Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver: a cohort study. World J Surg. 34(2) 309 - 313 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0330-x
11 Sa HS Ji JY Suh YL & Kim YD Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the orbit presenting as a subconjunctival mass. . 21(3) 211 - 215 2005. DOI: 10.1097/01.iop.0000161713.41406.d0
12 Wang Y Shen L Yun T Zhu C Wang P & Wang S Clinicopathological features of gastric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: Report of five cases. Exp Ther Med. 22(3) 948 2021. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10380
13 Evans J Chan C Gluch L Fielding I & Eckstein R Inflammatory pseudotumour secondary to actinomyces infection. Aust N Z J Surg. 69(6) 467 - 469 1999. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01602.x
14 Perera MT Wijesuriya SR Kumarage SK Ariyaratne MH & Deen KI Inflammatory pseudotumour of the liver caused by a migrated fish bone. Ceylon Med J. 52(4) 141 2009. DOI: 10.4038/cmj.v52i4.919
15 Meng S Liu G Wang S & Yang F Case report: inflammatory pseudotumor in the lung parenchyma caused by a medical suture originating from a cardiac surgery 35 years ago. J Cardiothorac Surg. 15(1) 151 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01194-z
16 Coffin CM Patel A Perkins S Elenitoba-Johnson KS Perlman E & Griffin CA ALK1 and p80 expression and chromosomal rearrangements involving 2p23 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Mod Pathol. 14(6) 569 - 576 2001. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880352
17 Lawrence B Perez-Atayde A Hibbard MK Rubin BP Dal Cin P Pinkus JL Pinkus GS Xiao S Yi ES Fletcher CD & Fletcher JA TPM3-ALK and TPM4-ALK oncogenes in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Am J Pathol. 157(2) 377 - 384 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64550-6
18 Gonzalez-Duarte A Sullivan S Sips GJ Naidich T Kleinman G Murray J Morgello S Germano I Mullen M & Simpson D Inflammatory pseudotumor associated with HIV, JCV, and immune reconstitution syndrome. Neurology. 72(3) 289 - 290 2009. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000339488.32588.0f
19 Gómez-Román JJ Sánchez-Velasco P Ocejo-Vinyals G Hernández-Nieto E Leyva-Cobián F & Val-Bernal JF Human Herpesvirus-8 genes are expressed in pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). Am J Surg Pathol. 25(5) 624 - 629 2001. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200105000-00009
20 van Baeten C & van Dorpe J Splenic Epstein-Barr virus-associated inflammatory pseudotumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 141(5) 722 - 727 2017. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0283-RS
21 Neuhauser TS Derringer GA Thompson LD Fanburg-Smith JC Aguilera NS Andriko J Chu WS & Abbondanzo SL Splenic inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). Arch Pathol Lab Med. 125(3) 379 - 385 2001. DOI: 10.5858/2001-125-0379-SIMTIP
22 Bruyeer E & Ramboer K Multiple inflammatory pseudotumors of the liver and spleen. JBR-BTR. 93(3) 122 2010. DOI: 10.5334/jbr-btr.188
23 Coffin CM Humphrey PA & Dehner LP Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a clinical and pathological survey. Semin Diagn Pathol. 15(2) 85 - 101 1998.
24 Yi XL Lu HY Wu YX Li WH Meng QG Cheng JW Tang Y Liu Y & Bai XZ Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with extensive involvement of the bladder in an adolescent: a case report. World J Surg Oncol. 11 206 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-206
25 Higashizono K Sato S Nagai E Taki Y Nishida M Watanabe M Arai K Takagi A & Oba N Esophageal inflammatory pseudotumor with low-dose corticosteroid therapy after surgery. Clin J Gastroenterol. 14(2) 427 - 433 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s12328-021-01377-8