1Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, ‘Laiko’ General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
3First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece
4Department of Cytopathology, 417 Army Equity Fund Hospital Cytology, Athens, Greece
5Department of Surgery, Halkida General Hospital, Halkida, Greece
6Department of Physiology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
7Department of Surgery, ‘’Bioclinic’’ Hospital, Athens, Greece
8Department of Urology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece
Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
Mar-Apr;
4(2):
129-134
DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10298
Received 26 November 2023 |
Revised 03 December 2024 |
Accepted 24 January 2024
Corresponding author
Evangelos Tsiambas, MD, MSc, Ph.D., 17 Patriarchou Grigoriou E’ Street, Ag. Paraskevi 15341, Athens, Greece. Tel: +30 6946939414, email:
tsiambasecyto@yahoo.gr
Abstract
Background/Aim: The tumor protein 53 (TP53) tumor suppressor protein (17p13.1) acts as a significant regulator for the cell cycle normal function. The gene is frequently mutated in colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) patients and is associated to poor prognosis and low response rates to chemo-targeted therapy. Our purpose was to correlate TP53 expression with Mouse Double Minute 2 Homolog (MDM2), a proto-oncogene (12q14.3) and a major negative regulator in the TP53-MDM2 auto-regulatory pathway. Materials and Methods: A total of forty (n=40) colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) cases were included in this study. An immunohistochemistry-based assay was implemented by using anti-TP53 and anti-MDM2 antibodies in the corresponding tissue sections. Additionally, a digital image analysis assay was implemented for objectively measuring TP53/MDM2 immunostaining intensity levels. Results: TP53 protein overexpression was detected in 27/40 (67.5%), whereas MDM2 overexpression in 28/40 (70%) cases. Interestingly, in 21/40 (52.5%) cases, a combined TP53/MDM2 co-expression was detected, whereas in 6/40 (15%), a combined loss of expression was identified (overall co-expression: p=0.119). p53 overexpression was significantly correlated to grade of the examined cases (p=0.001), whereas MDM2 to stage and max diameter of the malignancies (p=0.001 and 0.024, respectively). Conclusion: TP53/MDM2 over expression is a frequent and significant genetic event in CRCs associated with an aggressive biological behavior, as a result of increased dedifferentiation grade and advanced stage/elevated tumor volume, respectively. MDM2 oncogene overactivation combined with mutated and overexpressed TP53 is observed in sub-groups of patients leading to specific gene/protein signatures – targets for personalized chemotherapeutic approaches.
Keywords: Colon, carcinoma, gene, TP53, MDM2, oncogene, tumor suppressor
Normal cellular microenvironment homeostasis is mediated by critical molecules (1). Among them, tumor protein 53 (TP53) is a leading regulator that enhances the normal genomic function and structural stability (2). The corresponding gene is located on the short (p) arm of chromosome 17 (gene locus: 17p13.1). TP53 gene encodes for a nuclear phosphoprotein (molecular mass of 53 kDa) acting as a central transcription factor. TP53 can enhance apoptotic cell death, also reducing cell proliferation (3). Concerning its activity, it regulates the cell cycle by providing phase arrest at the level of G1/S and G2/M checkpoints (4). Interestingly, the P53/P21/DREAM/ E2F/CHR pathway is involved in cell cycle as a result of P53-mediated indirect transcriptional repression (5). This mechanism prevents DNA damage during DNA replication in the S phase. Additionally, TP53 promotes histone de-acetylation, proteolysis, apoptotic death, and negatively regulates helicase and telomerase activity (6-8). Furthermore, TP53 acts as a strong gene transcription factor, and is involved in critical molecular pathways that provide responses to intracellular hypoxia, modify protein oligomerization, base-excision repair, glucose deficit, apoptosis regulation and mitochondrial DNA stability (9,10).
TP53 interacts with mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2). The last molecule (also known as E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase), is referred as a proto-oncogene (gene locus: 12q14.3) that is responsible for the production of a nuclear-localized protein (11). The most crucial biochemical function that MDM2 regulates is the zinc ion binding to specific intra-cellular substrates. The molecule also demonstrates a ligase/transferase (12). MDM2 and TP53 form an auto-regulatory pathway. MDM2 binds directly to TP53, negatively modifying its transcriptional activity, promoting TP53 proteasomal degradation (13). More specifically, MDM2 binds to the TP53 N terminus inducing its ubiquitination and its permanent degradation. MDM2 oncogenic activity is mediated predominantly by gene amplification. In solid malignancies, -prominently in sarcomas and especially in liposarcomas- MDM2 overactivation is frequently correlated to a more aggressive phenotype in subsets of patients with specific genetic signatures (14). MDM2 mutations impair the ability to degrade the TP53 oncoprotein efficiently (15,16). In the current research study, we co-analyzed TP53 and MDM2 proteins in a series of colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRCs), exploring the potential impact of their co-expression levels on clinical-pathological features of the corresponding malignant tissues.
Materials and Methods
Study group and tissue specimens. A series of forty (n=40) archival, formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded CRC tissue specimens were obtained covering a broad spectrum of grades of differentiation and stages. Concerning the corresponding patients, nineteen (n=19, 47.5%) were female (mean age=64.5 years), whereas the rest (21, 52.5%) were males (mean age=67.2 years). The whole lab procedure took place in the First Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. The Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece ethics committee consented [Reference ID Research Protocol: 219/13-12-2019 (Research ID: 1920012595-11/12/19] to the use of these tissues stored in coded form in the laboratory of Pathological Anatomy for research purposes, according to World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki guidelines (2008, revised in 2014). The selected tissues were initially fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides of the corresponding samples were reviewed by two independent pathologists for the final histopathological diagnosis confirmation and classified according to the histological typing and grading criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) (17).
Immunohistochemistry assay (IHC). Ready-to-use anti-p53 (clone DO7, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark; dilution at 1:40) and anti-MDM2 (clone IF2, Novocastra, Newcastle, UK; dilution at 1:40) mouse monoclonal antibodies were used in the examined tissues. IHC protocols -based on the selected antibodies- were carried out on 4μm tissue sections. The slides were initially deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol solutions. Following this stage, the slides were immunostained for the markers based on the EN Vision+ (Dako) protocol by using an automated staining system (I 6000; Biogenex, Fremont, CA, USA) This specific assay is based on a soluble, dextran-polymer system that avoids an endogenous biotin reaction.
Following peroxidase blocking, the tissue sections were incubated by applying the primary antibody for 35 min at room temperature. After this stage, incubation with horseradish peroxidise-labelled polymer-HRP (Dako) LP for 30 min was performed. The antigen-antibody binding was visualized by applying the 3-3, diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) chromogen (Dako). At the final phase of the IHC process, the tissue sections were slightly counterstained by hematoxylin for 30 secs, dehydrated and mounted. Normal colon tissues expressing the markers were used as positive controls. For negative controls, the primary antibody was omitted. According to the antibody manufacturers, a predominantly nuclear and peri-nuclear staining pattern was considered an acceptable expression pattern for both (Figure 1a).
Digital image analysis assay (DIA). In order for TP53/MDM2 protein expression levels to be quantitatively and objectively evaluated, we implemented a DIA assay using a semi-automated system (hardware: Microscope CX-31, Olympus; Digital camera, Sony, Tokyo, Japan; Windows XP/NIS-Elements Software AR v3.0, Nikon Corp, Tokyo, Japan). The corresponding digital algorithm precisely calculated the corresponding staining intensity levels (densitometry evaluation) in the examined malignant cells. Ten (n=10) areas of interest per tissue section were identified (five high-power optical fields at ×400 magnification) and filed in a digital database as colored snapshots. Measurements were performed by implementing a specific macro (nuclear expression for malignant cells). Normal tissue sections (control) were measured independently and compared to the corresponding values that were extracted from the malignant tissue sections. A broad spectrum of continuous grey scale values (0-255) at the RedGreenBlue (RGB) pattern was available for discriminating different protein expression levels (Figure 1b, c). According to the DIA software, the staining intensity values that progressively decrease to 0 represent a continuous overexpression of the protein. In contrast, staining values that increase to 255 reflect a progressive loss of its staining intensity.
Statistical analysis. The statistics software package IBM SPSS v25 (Armonk, NY, USA) was used. Quantitative variables were presented as mean±standard deviation, while the qualitative variables were presented in frequency tables. To evaluate the relationship between qualitative and quantitative variables, due to the small number of subjects in each group, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied. To evaluate the relationship between independent qualitative variables, where appropriate, the chi-square (x2) and Fisher exact tests were applied. Statistical significance (p) was evaluated in pairs and differences <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
IHC results and statistical differences (p-Values) are presented in Table I. According to the DIA protein expression analysis, the examined colon adenocarcinoma tissues demonstrated different expression levels. In fact, TP53 protein overexpression (high expression as ≤132 staining intensity values in stained nuclei) was detected in 27/40 (67.5%), whereas MDM2 in 28/40 (70%) cases. In contrast, moderate-low expression staining intensity values (>138 ≤161) in stained nuclei were detected in the rest of the examined cases for both markers. Staining intensity values in the range of 133 and 138 were not detected. Interestingly, in 21/40 (52.5%) cases, a synchronous TP53/MDM2 expression was reported, whereas in 6/40 (15%), a progressive loss of their co-expression was detected (overall co-expression: p=0.119). TP53 overexpression was found to be significantly correlated to the grade of the analyzed cases (p=0.001), whereas MDM2 overall expression demonstrated a strong association with stage and max diameter of the malignancies (p=0.001 and 0.024, respectively).
Discussion
Identification of unique genetic events in solid malignancies is a modern and optimal approach for oncologists to plan and apply targeted chemotherapeutic strategies to patients (18-20). Concerning the TP53/MDM2 auto-regulatory pathway deregulation, it has been implicated on a variety of solid malignancies, including CRC (21,22). It is well known that TP53 nuclear over expression is detected in ~70-90% of solid malignancies characterized by different histo-genetic origins (23,24). Molecular analyses based on TP53 and other genes- including the K-RAS oncogene - have revealed simultaneous mutations that affect these genetic markers in specific populations (25,26). Besides K-RAS/TP53 mutations, multigene mutations in colon carcinoma patients create specific genetic signatures that modify the corresponding response levels to targeted therapeutic regimens (27,28).
In the current research study, we simultaneously analyzed TP53 and MDM2 proteins in a series of colon carcinoma cases, by implementing a protocol based on the combination of IHC and DIA for objectively estimating their protein expression levels. Our analysis revealed a significant co-expression of the examined markers. Concerning their impact on the clinical-pathological features of the malignancy, TP53 over expression was strongly correlated to the grade of the examined cases, whereas MDM2 to stage and max diameter of the malignancies. Concerning the modern oncological approaches, a combination of wild type P53 enhanced function and MDM2 decreased oncogenic activity should be a crucial step for handling subgroups of patients with specific genetic signatures (29,30). Interestingly, specific mutant TP53 variants (p53K120R) are involved in metabolic process in cancer patients, especially modulating glucose metabolism (31,32). Furthermore, TP53 alterations combined with mucin-5 over expression and microsatellite instability (MSI) are involved in colitis-associated colorectal carcinoma, as a result of a progressive chronic inflammation-dysplasia-cancer carcinogenesis process (33,34). Concerning new agents with anti-tumor activity that target TP53 expression, aurora-A - a key G2/M phase regulator kinase – seems to inhibit the TP53 signaling, negatively affecting the response to oxaliplatin-based treatment in CRC patients (35). Similarly, medicinal plants such as ginkgo biflavones could be used as wild type normal p53 enhancers and also MDM2 inhibitors in CRC patients with specific molecular substrates (36). Additionally, a plant substance derived from Ophiopogon japonicus, named cycloastragenol, demonstrates antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer effects by inducing apoptosis through p53 and c-MYC regulation (37,38).
Moreover, new genetic markers, such as microRNAs (miRs) and upregulated circular RNAs (circRNAs) seem to critically modify the TP53 expression levels in subsets of CRC patients (39). Two study groups reported a positive role of miR-887-3p in CRC by inhibiting cell proliferation and, in parallel, enhancing apoptotic rates due to wild type P53 activation, whereas miR-338-3p negatively affects the resistance rates to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in TP53 mutant CRC cases (40,41). Concerning the potential role of TP53 and MDM2 protein expression levels as reliable biomarkers for onset, progression, prognosis and modifiers of the CRC biological behavior, there is a variety of studies that provide positive results, especially correlating TP53 gene mutations with increased metastatic potential (42,43). Interestingly, specific MDM2 genetic signatures, including single nucleotide polymorphisms, seem to be significant for predicting increased susceptibility risk to CRC development compared with the wild-type T allele carriers (44). Additionally, phosphatase and the tensin homolog (PTEN, 10q23) suppressor gene silencing seems to increase MDM2 phosphorylation leading to normal p53 function in an experimental model of colon carcinogenesis (45).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the TP53 tumor suppressor gene apoptotic activity antagonizes the MDM2 oncogenic activity that induces proliferation in neoplastic and malignantly transformed cells. Mutant TP53 over expression combined with MDM2 over activation are frequently observed in CRC cases correlated to an aggressive biological behavior (dedifferentiation, increased tumor dimensions, and advanced stage). Interestingly, TP53 protein accumulation in the nucleus of tumor cells -as a result of TP53 mutations- does not necessarily combine with decreased MDM2 expression. As MDM2 directly binds to p53 and represses its transcriptional activity promoting p53 degradation, its overactivation negatively affects crucial apoptotic p53-based functions. TP53/MDM2 complex deregulation in solid malignancies, and particularly in CRC, is a target and challenge for further investigation and development of targeted anti-MDM2 strategies for an optimal oncological handling of CRC patients at the basis of specific genetic signatures.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Authors’ Contributions
AN and ET: Design of the study and article writing; DD, NK, DP, DS and KCK: review and data evaluation as academic advisors; HS, LM, DD, EF and SM: collection and management of references and published data. All Authors read and approved the final article.
References
1
Naser R
,
Fakhoury I
,
El-Fouani A
,
Abi-Habib R
&
El-Sibai M
. Role of the tumor microenvironment in cancer hallmarks and targeted therapy (Review). Int J Oncol.
62(2)
23
- 33
2023.
DOI:
10.3892/ijo.2022.5471
2
Joerger AC
&
Fersht AR
. The p53 pathway: Origins, inactivation in cancer, and emerging therapeutic approaches. Annu Rev Biochem.
85(1)
375
- 404
2016.
DOI:
10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014710
3
Purvis JE
,
Karhohs KW
,
Mock C
,
Batchelor E
,
Loewer A
&
Lahav G
. p53 dynamics control cell fate. Science.
336(6087)
1440
- 1444
2012.
DOI:
10.1126/science.1218351
4
Peng BY
,
Singh AK
,
Chan CH
,
Deng YH
,
Li PY
,
Su CW
,
Wu CY
&
Deng WP
. AGA induces sub-G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human colon cancer cells through p53-independent/p53-dependent pathway. BMC Cancer.
23(1)
1
2023.
DOI:
10.1186/s12885-022-10466-x
5
Engeland K
. Cell cycle arrest through indirect transcriptional repression by p53: I have a DREAM. Cell Death Differ.
25(1)
114
- 132
2018.
DOI:
10.1038/cdd.2017.172
6
Lipsick J
. A history of cancer research: Tumor suppressor genes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol.
12(2)
a035907
2020.
DOI:
10.1101/cshperspect.a035907
7
Mihara M
,
Erster S
,
Zaika A
,
Petrenko O
,
Chittenden T
,
Pancoska P
&
Moll UM
. p53 has a direct apoptogenic role at the mitochondria. Mol Cell.
11(3)
577
- 590
2003.
DOI:
10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00050-9
8
Duffy MJ
,
Synnott NC
&
Crown J
. Mutant p53 as a target for cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer.
83
258
- 265
2017.
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.023
9
Ozaki T
&
Nakagawara A
. Role of p53 in cell death and human cancers. Cancers (Basel).
3(1)
994
- 1013
2011.
DOI:
10.3390/cancers3010994
10
Shirangi TR
,
Zaika A
&
Moll UM
. Nuclear degradation of p53 occurs during down-regulation of the p53 response after DNA damage. FASEB J.
16(3)
420
- 422
2002.
DOI:
10.1096/fj.01-0617fje
11
Finlay CA
. The mdm-2 oncogene can overcome wild-type p53 suppression of transformed cell growth. Mol Cell Biol.
13(1)
301
- 306
1993.
DOI:
10.1128/mcb.13.1.301-306.1993
12
Lai Z
,
Ferry KV
,
Diamond MA
,
Wee KE
,
Kim YB
,
Ma J
,
Yang T
,
Benfield PA
,
Copeland RA
&
Auger KR
. Human mdm2 mediates multiple mono-ubiquitination of p53 by a mechanism requiring enzyme isomerization. J Biol Chem.
276(33)
31357
- 31367
2001.
DOI:
10.1074/jbc.M011517200
13
Grossman SR
,
Deato ME
,
Brignone C
,
Chan HM
,
Kung AL
,
Tagami H
,
Nakatani Y
&
Livingston DM
. Polyubiquitination of p53 by a Ubiquitin Ligase Activity of p300. Science.
300(5617)
342
- 344
2003.
DOI:
10.1126/science.1080386
14
Traweek RS
,
Cope BM
,
Roland CL
,
Keung EZ
,
Nassif EF
&
Erstad DJ
. Targeting the MDM2-p53 pathway in dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Front Oncol.
12
1006959
2022.
DOI:
10.3389/fonc.2022.1006959
15
Joseph TW
,
Zaika A
&
Moll UM
. Nuclear and cytoplasmic degradation of endogenous p53 and HDM2 occurs during down-regulation of the p53 response after multiple types of DNA damage. FASEB J.
17(12)
1622
- 1630
2003.
DOI:
10.1096/fj.02-0931com
16
Yu ZK
,
Geyer RK
&
Maki CG
. MDM2-dependent ubiquitination of nuclear and cytoplasmic P53. Oncogene.
19(51)
5892
- 5897
2000.
DOI:
10.1038/sj.onc.1203980
17
Nagtegaal ID
,
Odze RD
,
Klimstra D
,
Paradis V
,
Rugge M
,
Schirmacher P
,
Washington KM
,
Carneiro F
,
Cree IA
&
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board
. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology.
76(2)
182
- 188
2020.
DOI:
10.1111/his.13975
18
Albertson RC
,
Cresko W
,
Detrich HW 3rd
&
Postlethwait JH
. Evolutionary mutant models for human disease. Trends Genet.
25(2)
74
- 81
2009.
DOI:
10.1016/j.tig.2008.11.006
19
Gronroos E
&
López-García C
. Tolerance of chromosomal instability in cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Res.
78(23)
6529
- 6535
2018.
DOI:
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1958
20
Albertson DG
,
Collins C
,
McCormick F
&
Gray JW
. Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors. Nat Genet.
34(4)
369
- 376
2003.
DOI:
10.1038/ng1215
21
Italiano A
. Targeting MDM2 in soft-tissue sarcomas (and other solid tumors): The revival. Cancer Discov.
13(8)
1765
- 1767
2023.
DOI:
10.1158/2159-8290.CD-23-0605
22
Brummer T
&
Zeiser R
. The role of the MDM2/p53 axis in anti-tumor immune responses. Blood.
2023020731
2023.
DOI:
10.1182/blood.2023020731
23
Marques JF
&
Kops GJPL
. Permission to pass: on the role of p53 as a gatekeeper for aneuploidy. Chromosome Res.
31(4)
31
2023.
DOI:
10.1007/s10577-023-09741-9
24
Mansur MB
&
Greaves M
. Convergent TP53 loss and evolvability in cancer. BMC Ecol Evol.
23(1)
54
2023.
DOI:
10.1186/s12862-023-02146-6
25
Afrăsânie VA
,
Marinca MV
,
Gafton B
,
Alexa-Stratulat T
,
Rusu A
,
Froicu EM
,
Sur D
,
Lungulescu CV
,
Popovici L
,
Lefter AV
,
Afrăsânie I
,
Ivanov AV
,
Miron L
&
Rusu C
. Clinical, pathological and molecular insights on KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and TP53 mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients from northeastern Romania. Int J Mol Sci.
24(16)
12679
2023.
DOI:
10.3390/ijms241612679
26
Răduţă D
,
Dincă OM
,
Micu GV
,
Nichita L
,
Cioplea MD
,
Buşcă RM
,
Ardeleanu R
,
Mateescu RB
,
Benguş A
,
Zurac SA
,
Popp CG
&
Vlădan GC
. MLH1, BRAF and p53 – searching for significant markers to predict evolution towards adenocarcinoma in colonic sessile serrated lesions. Rom J Morphol Embryol.
62(4)
971
- 979
2021.
DOI:
10.47162/RJME.62.4.09
27
Shen CJ
,
Chan RH
,
Lin BW
,
Li NC
,
Huang YH
,
Chang WC
&
Chen BK
. Oleic acid-induced metastasis of KRAS/p53-mutant colorectal cancer relies on concurrent KRAS activation and IL-8 expression bypassing EGFR activation. Theranostics.
13(13)
4650
- 4666
2023.
DOI:
10.7150/thno.85855
28
Ottaiano A
,
Santorsola M
,
Capuozzo M
,
Perri F
,
Circelli L
,
Cascella M
,
Ianniello M
,
Sabbatino F
,
Granata V
,
Izzo F
,
Iervolino D
,
Casillo M
,
Petrillo N
,
Gualillo O
,
Nasti G
&
Savarese G
. The prognostic role of p53 mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol.
186
104018
2023.
DOI:
10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104018
29
Dey DK
,
Sharma C
,
Vadlamudi Y
&
Kang SC
. CopA3 peptide inhibits MDM2-p53 complex stability in colorectal cancers and activates p53 mediated cell death machinery. Life Sci.
318
121476
2023.
DOI:
10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121476
30
Hadni H
&
Elhallaoui M
. Discovery of anti-colon cancer agents targeting wild-type and mutant p53 using computer-aided drug design. J Biomol Struct Dyn.
41(19)
10171
- 10189
2023.
DOI:
10.1080/07391102.2022.2153919
31
Monti P
,
Ravera S
,
Speciale A
,
Velkova I
,
Foggetti G
,
Degan P
,
Fronza G
&
Menichini P
. Mutant p53(K120R) expression enables a partial capacity to modulate metabolism. Front Genet.
13
974662
2022.
DOI:
10.3389/fgene.2022.974662
32
Tang M
,
Xu H
,
Huang H
,
Kuang H
,
Wang C
,
Li Q
,
Zhang X
,
Ge Y
,
Song M
,
Zhang X
,
Wang Z
,
Ma C
,
Kang J
,
Zhang W
,
Wang Y
,
Zhang B
,
Zhang X
,
Chen Y
,
Cong M
,
Melino G
,
Wang X
,
Zhou F
,
Sun Q
&
Shi H
. Metabolism-based molecular subtyping endows effective ketogenic therapy in p53-mutant colon cancer. Adv Sci (Weinh).
9(29)
e2201992
2022.
DOI:
10.1002/advs.202201992
33
Gené M
,
Cuatrecasas M
,
Amat I
,
Veiga JA
,
Fernández Aceñero MJ
,
Fusté Chimisana V
,
Tarragona J
,
Jurado I
,
Fernández-Victoria R
,
Martínez Ciarpaglini C
,
Alenda González C
,
Zac C
,
Ortega de la Obra P
,
Fernández-Figueras MT
,
Esteller M
&
Musulen E
. Alterations in p53, microsatellite stability and lack of MUC5AC expression as molecular features of colorectal carcinoma associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Mol Sci.
24(10)
8655
2023.
DOI:
10.3390/ijms24108655
34
Foersch S
&
Neurath MF
. Colitis-associated neoplasia: molecular basis and clinical translation. Cell Mol Life Sci.
71(18)
3523
- 3535
2014.
DOI:
10.1007/s00018-014-1636-x
35
Chen MC
,
Yang BZ
,
Kuo WW
,
Wu SH
,
Wang TF
,
Yeh YL
,
Chen MC
&
Huang CY
. The involvement of Aurora-A and p53 in oxaliplatin-resistant colon cancer cells. J Cell Biochem.
124(4)
619
- 632
2023.
DOI:
10.1002/jcb.30394
36
Zhang S
,
Sun Y
,
Yao F
,
Li H
,
Yang Y
,
Li X
,
Bai Z
,
Hu Y
,
Wang P
&
Xu X
. Ginkgo biflavones cause p53 wild-type dependent cell death in a transcription-independent manner of p53. J Nat Prod.
86(2)
346
- 356
2023.
DOI:
10.1021/acs.jnatprod.2c00959
37
Ko HM
,
Jee W
,
Lee D
,
Jang HJ
&
Jung JH
. Ophiopogonin D increase apoptosis by activating p53 via ribosomal protein L5 and L11 and inhibiting the expression of c-Myc via CNOT2. Front Pharmacol.
13
974468
2022.
DOI:
10.3389/fphar.2022.974468
38
Park D
,
Jung JH
,
Ko HM
,
Jee W
,
Kim H
&
Jang HJ
. Antitumor effect of cycloastragenol in colon cancer cells via p53 activation. Int J Mol Sci.
23(23)
15213
2022.
DOI:
10.3390/ijms232315213
39
Weidle UH
&
Nopora A
. Up-regulated circular RNAs in colorectal cancer: New entities for therapy and tools for identification of therapeutic targets. Cancer Genomics Proteomics.
20(2)
132
- 153
2023.
DOI:
10.21873/cgp.20369
40
Teng D
,
Xia S
,
Hu S
,
Yan Y
,
Liu B
,
Yang Y
&
Du X
. miR-887-3p inhibits the progression of colorectal cancer via downregulating DNMT1 expression and regulating P53 expression. Comput Intell Neurosci.
2022
7179733
2022.
DOI:
10.1155/2022/7179733
41
Han J
,
Li J
,
Tang K
,
Zhang H
,
Guo B
,
Hou N
&
Huang C
. miR-338-3p confers 5-fluorouracil resistance in p53 mutant colon cancer cells by targeting the mammalian target of rapamycin. Exp Cell Res.
360(2)
328
- 336
2017.
DOI:
10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.09.023
42
Hirabayashi S
,
Hayashi M
,
Nakayama G
,
Mii S
,
Hattori N
,
Tanabe H
,
Kanda M
,
Tanaka C
,
Kobayashi D
,
Yamada S
,
Koike M
,
Fujiwara M
,
Takahashi M
&
Kodera Y
. The significance of molecular biomarkers on clinical survival outcome differs depending on colon cancer sidedness. Anticancer Res.
40(1)
201
- 211
2020.
DOI:
10.21873/anticanres.13941
43
Lee JH
,
Ahn BK
,
Baik SS
&
Lee KH
. Comprehensive analysis of somatic mutations in colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis. In Vivo.
33(2)
447
- 452
2019.
DOI:
10.21873/invivo.11493
44
Yueh TC
,
Hung YW
,
Shih TC
,
Wu CN
,
Wang SC
,
Lai YL
,
Hsu SW
,
Wu MH
,
Fu CK
,
Wang YC
,
Ke TW
,
Chang WS
,
Tsai CW
&
Bau DT
. Contribution of murine double minute 2 genotypes to colorectal cancer risk in Taiwan. Cancer Genomics Proteomics.
15(5)
405
- 411
2018.
DOI:
10.21873/cgp.20099
45
Ren G
,
Yang EJ
,
Tao S
,
Mou PK
,
Pu Y
,
Chen LJ
&
Shim JS
. MDM2 inhibition is synthetic lethal with PTEN loss in colorectal cancer cells via the p53-dependent mechanism. Int J Biol Sci.
19(11)
3544
- 3557
2023.
DOI:
10.7150/ijbs.82566