Abstract
Background/Aim: Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) indicate nutritional status and host immunity. We used immunohistochemistry and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values calculated using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to investigate relationships of these factors with pathological and radiological characteristics in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Patients and Methods: We evaluated expression levels of VEGFA, CD8, CD33, and ADC values in tumors pre/post nCRT; and analyzed the relationships between those factors and PNI, NLR in 32 patients. Results: Pretreatment PNI negatively correlated with change in tumor stromal CD8+ T cells and positively correlated with ADC values. Pretreatment NLR and PNI change correlated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). Conclusion: Patients with higher pretreatment PNI had greater changes in ADC values and stromal CD8+ T-cell counts, and those with greater PNI reduction from nCRT had a worse prognosis. Proper nutritional management during nCRT benefits patients and may lead to better prognosis in rectal cancer.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, prognostic nutritional index, Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, VEGFA, tumorinfiltrating lymphocytes, apparent diffusion coefficient
Colorectal cancer (CRC), one of the most common cancers worldwide in terms of morbidity and mortality, whilst being the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and the third most in men (1,2). In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and radical surgery are currently standard treatments in the North America and Europe (3). In Japan, preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is applied in some cases to improve R0 resectability to preserve anal sphincter function (3,4). However, tumor response to nCRT varies individually. Approximately 20% of these patients may not respond to nCRT and even suffer severe side-effects and lose their surgical chance (5). It is thus important to explore ways to predict treatment response and prognosis of patients who undergo nCRT, which will allow the selection of the patients most likely to benefit from nCRT.
Survival outcomes of CRC are predicted with tumor-associated factors and host-related factors (6). Tumor-associated factors include tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, tumor location, histological type, and tumor markers (7-9), whereas host-related factors include age, sex, life style, nutritional status, and systemic inflammatory response (6,10-12).
Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a parameter used to decide the nutritional and immune status of patients with malignant cancers of the gastrointestinal tract and is calculated from the values of serum albumin concentration and peripheral blood lymphocyte count (13). Although some studies have reported PNI to be a good predictor in CRC (12,14), few reports have addressed how tumors are both pathologically and radiologically affected by PNI in vivo.
The tumor microenvironment has been broadly studied and reported to interfere tumor response to CRT (15). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), such as CD4, CD8, and CD33 and angiogenetic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been identified as markers that predict the pathological reaction to nCRT in rectal cancer (16,17).
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), one of functional sequences of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), visualizes the random movement of water molecules within the tissue. DWI shows differences in contrast that reflect the microstructure within the tissue (18,19). DWI is expected to aid in predicting both pathological T and N stages and also the response of LARC to nCRT (18).
Herein, we investigated the tumor response by performing pathological evaluation and imaging of the patients who underwent nCRT and subsequent surgery for rectal cancer. Pathological evaluation included CD8+, CD33+ TILs expression and expression level of VEGF A (VEGFA) in tumor tissue.
Further, to quantify the tumor status with imaging, we applied DWI, which quantifies the restriction of the random Brownian motion of water molecules in tissues as the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (18). We used PNI and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as the respective indicators of nutritional status and immune status. NLR is a systemic inflammatory response factor of CRC that is associated with poor prognosis (20). Finally, we investigated how PNI and NLR are related to ADC values and pathological changes.
Patients and Methods
Patients and study design. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gifu University Hospital (IRB number 2021-076). Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to treatment for clinical research.
Between September 2013 and June 2020, 32 patients with primary CRC were included in this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were 1) histologically diagnosed rectal cancer, 2) treatment by surgical resection combined with nCRT, 3) availability of surgical specimens, and 4) availability of MRI including DWI.
Preoperative radiotherapy was delivered at a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the pelvis. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered using one of two regimens, oral capecitabine (twice/day at a dose of 825 mg/m2) on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, 22-26, and 29-33 or infusion of oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 plus oral S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) on days 1-5, 8-12, 22-26, and 29-33. Clinical characteristics of the patients were obtained from their medical records and comprised sex, age, clinical regimen, histological type, pathological stage, distant metastasis, CEA levels, CA19-9 levels, PNI, and NLRs. The PNI was calculated as 10 × serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3) (13). The NLR was calculated as the number of neutrophils divided by the number of lymphocytes (20).
Immunohistochemistry (IHC). Paraffin-embedded samples were sliced into 4-μm-thick sections and IHC were performed using antibodies for VEGFA (rabbit monoclonal IgG; prediluted; cat no. ab27620), CD8 (rabbit monoclonal IgG; 1:500; cat no. ab93278), and CD33 (rabbit monoclonal IgG; 1:100; cat no. ab199432) (all from Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Following baking in a 65˚C oven for 30 min, the samples were deparaffinized in xylene with rehydration in graded alcohol, and then transferred to a container of tap water. For antigen retrieval, the sections were placed in a pressure cooker for 10 min at 110˚C in citrate buffer at pH 6.0 for the VEGFA antigen and Tris-EDTA buffer at pH 9.0 for the CD8 and CD33 antigens. Then, the samples were put to room temperature and rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice for 5 min. The activity of endogenous peroxidase was blocked by 3% hydrogen peroxide-methanol for 10 min at room temperature. The slides were incubated with primary antibodies at 4˚C overnight.
The peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were added onto the slides at room temperature for 1 h after washing with PBS three times for 5 min. All slides were washed three times again and had 3, 3’-diaminobenzidine applied. Finally, the slides were counterstained with hematoxylin for 2 sec and dehydrated, and a cover slip was mounted.
Evaluation of immunohistochemistry. Two authors (C. M. and H. T., an experienced pathologist) conducted histological assessments without knowledge of the clinical information of each patient. The expression of VEGFA was assessed by staining intensity and percentage of positive tumor cells on each slide (21). The staining intensity was scored classifying as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (strong). The percentage of positive tumor cells was divided into 0-10, 11-25, 26-50, 51-75, and >75% and scored as 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The scores of staining intensity were multiplied by the scores of the percentage of stained cells (0-100%), and the final scores of 0-1, 2-3, 4-6, and 7-12 were classified as –, +, ++, and +++, respectively (Figure 1). For CD8 and CD33 immunohistochemistry, all slides were firstly scanned at lower-power magnification (10×), and the 5 regions with the densest accumulation of intratumoral and stromal CD8+ and CD33+ T cells were identified (22). Within these regions, CD8+ or CD33+ T cells were then counted in 5 high-power fields (HPF) each (40×; area=0.1886 mm2) (Figure 2). The average number of infiltrating T cells per HPF was determined for each area and applied for statistical analysis.
MRI imaging and ADC evaluation. All MRI scans with DWI sequence had been performed before the neoadjuvant and surgical therapies. Patients were imaged in a 1.5-T MR magnet (Intera Achieva 1.5-T Pulsar, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands), using a phased-array body coil. All MR images were obtained at a section thickness of 5 mm with 2-mm intersection gap. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo [repetition time/echo time (TR/TE)=2,999-6,832/90-100 ms; FOV 28×28 cm] and DW single-shot spin-echo echo planar (TR/TE=3,999-6,008/60-100 ms: FOV 28×28 cm; b-value=0 and 1,000 s/mm2) images were obtained. The MR images were analyzed by a radiologist with 5 years of post-training experience in reading rectal MRI examinations, and the clinicopathological patient data was blinded. Mean ADC was calculated from a sample of three round/oval-shaped regions of interest (ROIs) that were manually placed in the solid tumor parts of three independent tumor-containing slices. The size and position of the ROIs were chosen to include as much of the solid tumor portion as possible. Patients with mucinous-appearing tumors on the primary staging MRI were excluded because these tumors are known to have low cellular density and show high ADC values and, as such, could potentially introduce bias in the study results (23). The amount of change in the ADC values between pretreatment status and post nCRT status was used to define the change in ADC values. Examples of T2-MRI images and DWI-MRI images of a good response case and a poor response case are shown in Figure 3.
Statistical analysis. Characteristics of patients are presented as the median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. The relationship of pretreatment PNI, pretreatment NLR, and changes in PNI and NLR to histopathological findings was evaluated by multivariable linear regression models. Pretreatment PNI, pretreatment NLR, and changes in PNI and NLR were also assessed using multivariable linear regression models to determine whether they were associated with changes in ADC. Each model incorporated either the change in NLR or in PNI and an adjustment variable as an explanatory variable. Each model was adjusted for age and histological type because these variables were considered to bias the conclusions. A Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for age was used to explore factors affecting recurrence-free survival (RFS) times. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.0.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
Clinicopathological characteristics. The clinicopathological features of the patients are shown in Table I. In total, 32 patients with LARC who underwent nCRT followed by surgical resection were included in the present study. Imaging data were available for 30 patients, and biopsy specimens were available for 20 patients. The median age was 68 years (IQR=59-74 years; range=45-82 years) and 23 patients (71.9%) were male. Nineteen patients (59.4%) received capecitabine and 13 patients (40.6%) received S-1 plus oxaliplatin during the CRT period. The mean ADC value was 0.9×10–3 mm2/s (range=0.651-1.25×10–3 mm2/s). After nCRT, 21 (72.4%) patients had T3-4 tumors. In total, 26 patients (81.2%) showed tubular adenocarcinoma histology, and 10 (31.2%) and 4 (12.5%) patients had lymph node and distant metastases, respectively.
Histopathological findings. Surgical specimens were available for all 32 patients, and biopsy specimens were available for 20 patients. Among the 20 patients, 2 were diagnosed as having pathological complete response to CRT, so they were excluded from evaluation of CD8 and CD33 staining. In the surgical specimens, stromal CD8+ T cells were more frequent (median cell count/HPF 44.6 cells) than intratumoral CD8+ T cells (median cell count/HPF 2.2 cells). A similar pattern was observed for CD33+ T cells: median cell count of stromal CD33+ T cells=5.2 cells and intratumoral CD33+ T cells=0 cells). Similar patterns were observed in the biopsy specimen as were seen in the surgical specimens. Stromal CD8+ T cells were more frequent (median cell count/HPF 50.2 cells) than intratumoral CD8+ T cells (median cell count/HPF 2.2 cells). Stromal CD33+ T cells were more frequent (median cell count/HPF 16.2 cells) than intratumoral CD33+ T cells (median cell count/HPF 0 cells). VEGFA staining was localized in the cytoplasm of the tumor cell and in the vasculature of tumor stroma (Figure 1).
Correlation between histopathological findings and PNI and NLR. There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between the change in stromal CD8+ T-cell numbers in tumor tissue and pretreatment PNI [coefficient (β)=-3.78; 95% confidence interval (CI)=–7.07 - –0.5; p=0.028] (Figure 4A). There was also a significant inverse correlation between the change in VEGFA score and change in NLR (β=–0.7; 95% CI=–1.41-0; p=0.049). However, there was no association between pretreatment NLR and histopathological changes or between CD33+ T cells in tumor tissue and PNI and NLR.
Radiological findings and correlation between ADC/PNI and NLR. The mean ADC value was 0.9×10–3 mm2/s (range=0.651-1.25×10–3 mm2/s) for the whole patient population. There was a positive correlation between pretreatment PNI and the change in ADC values (β=0.02, 95% CI=0-0.04; p=0.033) (Figure 4B) and an inverse correlation between the change in NLR and that in ADC values (β=–0.03, 95% CI=–0.07-0; p=0.038). There was no association between pretreatment NLR and ADC values.
Association between preoperative factors and RFS. Five cases with distant metastasis were excluded from the prognostic analysis. The increased positive changes in PNI [hazard ratio (HR)=0.89; 95% CI=0.8-0.97; p=0.013] and in lower pretreatment NLR (HR=1.86; 95% CI=1.17-2.93; p=0.008) were associated with favorable RFS times (Table II). The increased change in ADC values also tended to show a strong association with favorable RFS times (HR=0.17; 95% CI=0.02-1.33; p=0.09). Higher pretreatment ADC values were strongly associated with unfavorable RFS times (HR=6.86; 95% CI=1.19-39.57; p=0.031).
Discussion
nCRT for LARC has been reported to result in a reduced incidence of local recurrence while improving both disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) (24) and increasing the rates of resectability and sphincter-saving surgery (25). However, patients who do not respond well to nCRT may suffer tumor growth and distant metastases during nCRT and the following surgery. Therefore, the prediction of tumor response before nCRT is a proper issue.
The assessment of preoperative nutritional status is generally considered to be useful in predicting perioperative risk, reducing the incidence of postoperative involvements, and improving prognosis. The PNI was originally proposed by Buzby et al. and includes serum albumin, triceps skinfold thickness, serum transferrin, and lagged hypersensitivity reaction in the calculation (26). The formula is intricate and hard to use constantly in the clinical setting. Thus, Onodera et al. made the formula simpler to be based on serum albumin levels and the peripheral blood lymphocyte count (13). These formulas were exploited to expect the risk of perioperative complications by preoperative assessment with the PNI and to decide the timing of surgical treatment. Kanda et al. described that low preoperative PNI was an independent risk factor for perioperative complications and a significant poor prognostic factor for RFS and OS in patients with pancreatic and gastric cancer (27,28). Jian-hui et al. reported that the low PNI cohort had a worse OS than the high PNI cohort (five-year survival rate 56.1 vs. 64.8%, respectively; p<0.05) in CRC (14). In addition, Okugawa et al. reported a low pre-nCRT PNI to be a more powerful indicator of poor prognosis and early recurrence in patients with lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer (29). Similarly, Kosuga et al. reported that low PNI combined with preoperative CT findings in advanced gastric cancer may predict pathological lymph node metastasis (30). These suggest that PNI, when combined with other clinical information, may contribute to pathological diagnosis and prognosis in addition to predicting the risk of perioperative complications.
First, we investigated pathological and imaging changes in patients with a high versus low pretreatment PNI during nCRT and confirmed that the prognosis of the patients with low PNI was poor in this study. Therefore, PNI could be a potential prognostic factor as indicated in previous reports (12,29). Thus, although PNI is well known to be associated with prognosis, how nutrition as reflected by the PNI affects not only prognosis but also the nCRT process in rectal cancer is not well known.
Second, we evaluated the ADC values and histopathological changes in the high PNI group to examine whether we could predict the effect of nCRT from preoperative images. DWI has been applied to the detection and depiction of malignant tumors in the abdominal region and to pathological differentiation of lesions because it can quantify the restriction of random movement of water molecules in tissues as the ADC (31). Malignant tumors generally have high cellularity, tissue disorganization, and increased tortuosity of the extracellular space, which limit the diffusion of water molecules, thus resulting in a low ADC value (32). Recently several studies reported ADC values to be a reliable biomarker in the assessment of tumor response to nCRT in rectal cancer. According to Schurink et al., all studies they reviewed reported an increase in mean tumor ADC during nCRT, which is thought to be a result of radiation-induced cellular damage and necrosis (33). Furthermore, several studies reviewed Schurink et al. found higher pre-nCRT values in the unfavorable response groups (34,35). A high ADC is thought to be associated with tissue necrosis, which in turn leads to decreased tissue perfusion and hypoxia, making the tumor less susceptible to the effects of CRT (36).
We also investigated the relationship between ADC values and PNI before and after nCRT. The amount of change in ADC values was significantly higher in the patients with higher pretreatment PNI. In addition, RFS tended to be longer in the group with a higher change in ADC values. These results indicate that the change in ADC values after nCRT may reflect a positive change in tumor response. Thus, we examined how the changes in ADC values reflect the tumor microenvironment. Some studies reported a relationship between ADC values and pathological findings including gene mutation. Xu et al. retrospectively analyzed the differences in radiological characteristics of rectal cancers with different KRAS gene status and found that the KRAS mutant cohort tended to have higher T-stage and lower ADC values than the K-RAS wild-type cohort (t=7.086, p=0.029; t=–2.708, p=0.008, respectively) (37). In the future, MRI imaging may be able to predict biomarkers in addition to gene expression, including BRAF and microsatellite instability.
There are some reports pf ADC values negatively correlating with CD3+ T cell counts and CD3e levels, which both are a similar indicator of T lymphocyte influx into tumor tissue to CD8+ T-cell (38,39). Swartz et al. surmised that lymphocytes are very small and have a high nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio; thus, high numbers of TILs should theoretically lead to lower ADC values (38). Another report noted that the high density of CD8+ T cells in cancer biopsy samples was intensively correlated with tumor downstaging and was an independent factor for nCRT in CRC (16); inversely, McCoy et al. described that CD8+ T cells had no significant association with the regression grade of tumors (40). In the present study, pretreatment PNI was negatively correlated with stromal CD8+ T-cell expression. There are two possible reasons for this. First, this may be due to different methods to count cells such as objective lens magnification, selection for observation field of tumor nodules. In some of the cases we observed, much fibrotic tissue was present near the tumor nodules, and even though abundant lymphocytes were present, they did not extend to the tumor nodules. Lieubeau et al. suggested that due to their contractive characteristics and presumably also their accompanied extracellular matrix, myofibroblasts may prevent the penetration of immune cells within tumors, thus creating a physical barrier against immune reaction while promoting tumor growth and progression (41). Second, this might be a result of tumor resistance. Radiotherapy is thought to activate anti-tumor immunity throughout the body, as represented by the abscopal effect (42), whereas the tumor itself is thought to strengthen the immune escape mechanism. Sato et al. speculated that DNA damage signaling may, in part, lead to the increase in PD-L1 expression in tumors when DNA repair and signaling are downregulated, especially in patients who are treated with radiochemotherapy (43). In recent years, there have been increasing reports that expect the combination of CRT and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to overcome the immune escape mechanism used by tumors (44,45).
We also focused on NLR, a marker of inflammation, and found that lower changes in PNI and lower pretreatment NLR were associated with poorer prognosis suggesting that both PNI and NLR could be used as markers to predict clinical outcome. Yang et al. evaluated the prognostic value of pretreatment inflammatory indexes including NLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index in CRC patients taking nCRT. Their study revealed that distant metastasis and NLR were the independent prognostic factors of progression-free survival and OS (46). Although our study showed no notable correlations between pretreatment NLR and changes in ADC values or in histopathology, Chen et al. described that high NLR correlated with increased expression of VEGF in metastatic CRC (47).
The present study has several limitations. First, the sample size was small and conducted at a single institution. Second, heterogeneity of TILs in the tumor remains a complicated topic. Lastly, the relationships between the characteristics and long-term outcomes, i.e., OS could not be determined because of the limited observation period. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the impact of PNI on nCRT for rectal cancer using the relationship between changes in ADC values as well as pathological changes. The combination of PNI, ADC changes, and pathological changes may allow to know more accurate prognosis after treatment. Therefore, these relationships need to be validated in further studies with large sample size and long period for observation.
In conclusion, the study patients with higher pretreatment PNI had greater changes in ADC values and stromal CD8+ T-cell counts, and those with a large decrease in PNI during nCRT had a worse prognosis. This study suggests that PNI may be useful as a prognostic factor for nCRT in rectal cancer, and that patients with better pretreatment and presurgical PNI may benefit from the treatment. Patient management that maintains or improves their nutritional status during treatment may lead to better a prognosis in rectal cancer.
Conflicts of Interest
Authors’ Contributions
CM and NM, HT conceived the study and its design. CM, NM, HT, TT, TS, JT, SK, IY, YT, NO, KM, MF, MK, TI, MM, TM, AH, and KY acquired the data. CM, NM, HT, TI analyzed and interpreted the data and drafted the article. CM, NM, HT, and KY performed critical revision of the article. HT and KY supervised the study. CM, NM, and HT confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
2
Bray F
,
Ferlay J
,
Soerjomataram I
,
Siegel RL
,
Torre LA
&
Jemal A
. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin.
68(6)
394
- 424
2018.
PMID:
30207593.
DOI:
10.3322/caac.21492
3
Hashiguchi Y
,
Muro K
,
Saito Y
,
Ito Y
,
Ajioka Y
,
Hamaguchi T
,
Hasegawa K
,
Hotta K
,
Ishida H
,
Ishiguro M
,
Ishihara S
,
Kanemitsu Y
,
Kinugasa Y
,
Murofushi K
,
Nakajima TE
,
Oka S
,
Tanaka T
,
Taniguchi H
,
Tsuji A
,
Uehara K
,
Ueno H
,
Yamanaka T
,
Yamazaki K
,
Yoshida M
,
Yoshino T
,
Itabashi M
,
Sakamaki K
,
Sano K
,
Shimada Y
,
Tanaka S
,
Uetake H
,
Yamaguchi S
,
Yamaguchi N
,
Kobayashi H
,
Matsuda K
,
Kotake K
,
Sugihara K
&
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum
. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol.
25(1)
1
- 42
2020.
PMID:
31203527.
DOI:
10.1007/s10147-019-01485-z
4
Rullier E
,
Goffre B
,
Bonnel C
,
Zerbib F
,
Caudry M
&
Saric J
. Preoperative radiochemotherapy and sphincter-saving resection for T3 carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum. Ann Surg.
234(5)
633
- 640
2001.
PMID:
11685026.
DOI:
10.1097/00000658-200111000-00008
5
Huang Y
,
Lou XY
,
Zhu YX
,
Wang YC
,
Zhang L
,
Liu HL
,
Wang C
,
Zhan HM
,
Cheng ZQ
,
Tan WY
,
Wang L
&
Fan XJ
. Local environment in biopsy better predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Biosci Rep.
39(3)
BSR20190003
2019.
PMID:
30867256.
DOI:
10.1042/BSR20190003
6
Peng J
,
Zhang R
,
Zhao Y
,
Wu X
,
Chen G
,
Wan D
,
Lu Z
&
Pan Z
. Prognostic value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index and its associations with systemic inflammatory response markers in patients with stage III colon cancer. Chin J Cancer.
36(1)
96
2017.
PMID:
29268783.
DOI:
10.1186/s40880-017-0260-1
7
Zhang Y
,
Ma J
,
Zhang S
,
Deng G
,
Wu X
,
He J
,
Pei H
,
Shen H
&
Zeng S
. A prognostic analysis of 895 cases of stage III colon cancer in different colon subsites. Int J Colorectal Dis.
30(9)
1173
- 1183
2015.
PMID:
26054387.
DOI:
10.1007/s00384-015-2273-z
8
Lin BR
,
Lin YL
,
Lai HS
,
Lee PH
,
Chang KJ
&
Liang JT
. Overall survival of Stage III colon cancer with only one lymph node metastasis is independently predicted by preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level and lymph node sampling status. PLoS One.
10(9)
e0137053
2015.
PMID:
26381396.
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0137053
9
Wang F
,
Bai L
,
Liu TS
,
Yu YY
,
He MM
,
Liu KY
,
Luo HY
,
Zhang DS
,
Jin Y
,
Wang FH
,
Wang ZQ
,
Wang DS
,
Qiu MZ
,
Ren C
,
Li YH
&
Xu RH
. Right-sided colon cancer and left-sided colorectal cancers respond differently to cetuximab. Chin J Cancer.
34(9)
384
- 393
2015.
PMID:
26111811.
DOI:
10.1186/s40880-015-0022-x
11
Ward WH
,
Goel N
,
Ruth KJ
,
Esposito AC
,
Lambreton F
,
Sigurdson ER
,
Meyer JE
&
Farma JM
. Predictive value of leukocyte- and platelet-derived ratios in rectal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Res.
232
275
- 282
2018.
PMID:
30463730.
DOI:
10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.060
12
Nozoe T
,
Kohno M
,
Iguchi T
,
Mori E
,
Maeda T
,
Matsukuma A
&
Ezaki T
. The prognostic nutritional index can be a prognostic indicator in colorectal carcinoma. Surg Today.
42(6)
532
- 535
2012.
PMID:
22139087.
DOI:
10.1007/s00595-011-0061-0
13
Onodera T
,
Goseki N
&
Kosaki G
. [Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients]. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi.
85(9)
1001
- 1005
1984.
PMID:
6438478.
14
Jian-Hui C
,
Iskandar EA
,
Cai ShI
,
Chen CQ
,
Wu H
,
Xu JB
&
He YL
. Significance of Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index in patients with colorectal cancer: a large cohort study in a single Chinese institution. Tumour Biol.
37(3)
3277
- 3283
2016.
PMID:
26438061.
DOI:
10.1007/s13277-015-4008-8
15
Diakos CI
,
Charles KA
,
McMillan DC
&
Clarke SJ
. Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol.
15(11)
e493
- e503
2014.
PMID:
25281468.
DOI:
10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70263-3
16
Shinto E
,
Omata J
,
Sikina A
,
Sekizawa A
,
Kajiwara Y
,
Hayashi K
,
Hashiguchi Y
,
Hase K
&
Ueno H
. Predictive immunohistochemical features for tumour response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. BJS Open.
4(2)
301
- 309
2020.
PMID:
32026629.
DOI:
10.1002/bjs5.50251
17
Kim HJ
,
Bae SB
,
Jeong D
,
Kim ES
,
Kim CN
,
Park DG
,
Ahn TS
,
Cho SW
,
Shin EJ
,
Lee MS
&
Baek MJ
. Upregulation of stromal cell-derived factor 1α expression is associated with the resistance to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer: angiogenic markers of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Oncol Rep.
32(6)
2493
- 2500
2014.
PMID:
25241658.
DOI:
10.3892/or.2014.3504
18
Yin JD
,
Song LR
,
Lu HC
&
Zheng X
. Prediction of different stages of rectal cancer: Texture analysis based on diffusion-weighted images and apparent diffusion coefficient maps. World J Gastroenterol.
26(17)
2082
- 2096
2020.
PMID:
32536776.
DOI:
10.3748/wjg.v26.i17.2082
19
Mayer P
,
Linnebacher A
,
Glennemeier-Marke H
,
Marnet N
,
Bergmann F
,
Hackert T
,
Klauss M
,
Poth T
&
Gaida MM
. The microarchitecture of pancreatic cancer as measured by diffusionweighted magnetic resonance imaging is altered by t cells with a tumor promoting th17 phenotype. Int J Mol Sci.
21(1)
PMID:
31948053.
DOI:
10.3390/ijms21010346
20
Walsh SR
,
Cook EJ
,
Goulder F
,
Justin TA
&
Keeling NJ
. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol.
91(3)
181
- 184
2005.
PMID:
16118772.
DOI:
10.1002/jso.20329
21
Yuan XH
,
Yang J
,
Wang XY
,
Zhang XL
,
Qin TT
&
Li K
. Association between egfr/kras mutation and expression of vegfa, vegfr and vegfr2 in lung adenocarcinoma. Oncol Lett.
16(2)
2105
- 2112
2018.
PMID:
30008907.
DOI:
10.3892/ol.2018.8901
22
Koelzer VH
,
Lugli A
,
Dawson H
,
Hädrich M
,
Berger MD
,
Borner M
,
Mallaev M
,
Galván JA
,
Amsler J
,
Schnüriger B
,
Zlobec I
&
Inderbitzin D
. CD8/CD45RO T-cell infiltration in endoscopic biopsies of colorectal cancer predicts nodal metastasis and survival. J Transl Med.
12
81
2014.
PMID:
24679169.
DOI:
10.1186/1479-5876-12-81
23
Curvo-Semedo L
,
Lambregts DM
,
Maas M
,
Beets GL
,
Caseiro-Alves F
&
Beets-Tan RG
. Diffusion-weighted MRI in rectal cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness. J Magn Reson Imaging.
35(6)
1365
- 1371
2012.
PMID:
22271382.
DOI:
10.1002/jmri.23589
24
Chari RS
,
Tyler DS
,
Anscher MS
,
Russell L
,
Clary BM
,
Hathorn J
&
Seigler HF
. Preoperative radiation and chemotherapy in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg.
221(6)
778
- 86
1995.
PMID:
7794081.
DOI:
10.1097/00000658-199506000-00016
25
Gavioli M
,
Losi L
,
Luppi G
,
Iacchetta F
,
Zironi S
,
Bertolini F
,
Falchi AM
,
Bertoni F
&
Natalini G
. Preoperative therapy for lower rectal cancer and modifications in distance from anal sphincter. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
69(2)
370
- 375
2007.
PMID:
17524570.
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.049
26
Buzby GP
,
Mullen JL
,
Matthews DC
,
Hobbs CL
&
Rosato EF
. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery. Am J Surg.
139(1)
160
- 167
1980.
PMID:
7350839.
DOI:
10.1016/0002-9610(80)90246-9
27
Kanda M
,
Fujii T
,
Kodera Y
,
Nagai S
,
Takeda S
&
Nakao A
. Nutritional predictors of postoperative outcome in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg.
98(2)
268
- 274
2011.
PMID:
20960457.
DOI:
10.1002/bjs.7305
28
Kanda M
,
Mizuno A
,
Tanaka C
,
Kobayashi D
,
Fujiwara M
,
Iwata N
,
Hayashi M
,
Yamada S
,
Nakayama G
,
Fujii T
,
Sugimoto H
,
Koike M
,
Takami H
,
Niwa Y
,
Murotani K
&
Kodera Y
. Nutritional predictors for postoperative short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with gastric cancer. Medicine (Baltimore).
95(24)
e3781
2016.
PMID:
27310954.
DOI:
10.1097/md.0000000000003781
29
Okugawa Y
,
Toiyama Y
,
Oki S
,
Ide S
,
Yamamoto A
,
Ichikawa T
,
Kitajima T
,
Fujikawa H
,
Yasuda H
,
Saigusa S
,
Hiro J
,
Yoshiyama S
,
Kobayashi M
,
Araki T
&
Kusunoki M
. Feasibility of assessing prognostic nutrition index in patients with rectal cancer who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
42(6)
998
- 1007
2018.
PMID:
29786882.
DOI:
10.1002/jpen.1041
30
Kosuga T
,
Konishi T
,
Kubota T
,
Shoda K
,
Konishi H
,
Shiozaki A
,
Okamoto K
,
Fujiwara H
,
Kudou M
,
Arita T
,
Morimura R
,
Murayama Y
,
Kuriu Y
,
Ikoma H
,
Nakanishi M
&
Otsuji E
. Value of prognostic nutritional index as a predictor of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res.
39(12)
6843
- 6849
2019.
PMID:
31810951.
DOI:
10.21873/anticanres.13901
31
Türkbey B
,
Aras Ö
,
Karabulut N
,
Turgut AT
,
Akpinar E
,
Alibek S
,
Pang Y
,
Ertürk Ş M
,
El Khouli RH
,
Bluemke DA
&
Choyke PL
. Diffusion-weighted mri for detecting and monitoring cancer: A review of current applications in body imaging. Diagn Interv Radiol.
18(1)
46
- 59
2012.
DOI:
10.4261/1305-3825.Dir.4708-11.2
32
Padhani AR
,
Liu G
,
Koh DM
,
Chenevert TL
,
Thoeny HC
,
Takahara T
,
Dzik-Jurasz A
,
Ross BD
,
Van Cauteren M
,
Collins D
,
Hammoud DA
,
Rustin GJ
,
Taouli B
&
Choyke PL
. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: Consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia.
11(2)
102
- 125
2009.
PMID:
19186405.
DOI:
10.1593/neo.81328
33
Schurink NW
,
Lambregts DMJ
&
Beets-Tan RGH
. Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer: current applications and future perspectives. Br J Radiol.
92(1096)
20180655
2019.
PMID:
30433814.
DOI:
10.1259/bjr.20180655
34
Jung SH
,
Heo SH
,
Kim JW
,
Jeong YY
,
Shin SS
,
Soung MG
,
Kim HR
&
Kang HK
. Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: diffusion-weighted 3 Tesla MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging.
35(1)
110
- 116
2012.
PMID:
21989997.
DOI:
10.1002/jmri.22749
35
Jacobs L
,
Intven M
,
van Lelyveld N
,
Philippens M
,
Burbach M
,
Seldenrijk K
,
Los M
&
Reerink O
. Diffusion-weighted MRI for early prediction of treatment response on preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a feasibility study. Ann Surg.
263(3)
522
- 528
2016.
PMID:
26106836.
DOI:
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001311
36
Jordan BF
&
Sonveaux P
. Targeting tumor perfusion and oxygenation to improve the outcome of anticancer therapy. Front Pharmacol.
3
94
2012.
PMID:
22661950.
DOI:
10.3389/fphar.2012.00094
37
Xu Y
,
Xu Q
,
Ma Y
,
Duan J
,
Zhang H
,
Liu T
,
Li L
,
Sun H
,
Shi K
,
Xie S
&
Wang W
. Characterizing MRI features of rectal cancers with different KRAS status. BMC Cancer.
19(1)
1111
2019.
PMID:
31727020.
DOI:
10.1186/s12885-019-6341-6
38
Swartz JE
,
Driessen JP
,
van Kempen PMW
,
de Bree R
,
Janssen LM
,
Pameijer FA
,
Terhaard CHJ
,
Philippens MEP
&
Willems S
. Influence of tumor and microenvironment characteristics on diffusion-weighted imaging in oropharyngeal carcinoma: A pilot study. Oral Oncol.
77
9
- 15
2018.
PMID:
29362130.
DOI:
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.001
39
Cho HR
,
Jeon H
,
Park CK
,
Park SH
&
Choi SH
. Radiogenomics profiling for glioblastoma-related immune cells reveals CD49d expression correlation with MRI parameters and prognosis. Sci Rep.
8(1)
16022
2018.
PMID:
30375429.
DOI:
10.1038/s41598-018-34242-9
40
McCoy MJ
,
Hemmings C
,
Miller TJ
,
Austin SJ
,
Bulsara MK
,
Zeps N
,
Nowak AK
,
Lake RA
&
Platell CF
. Low stromal Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell density is associated with complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Br J Cancer.
113(12)
1677
- 1686
2015.
PMID:
26645238.
DOI:
10.1038/bjc.2015.427
42
Demaria S
,
Ng B
,
Devitt ML
,
Babb JS
,
Kawashima N
,
Liebes L
&
Formenti SC
. Ionizing radiation inhibition of distant untreated tumors (abscopal effect) is immune mediated. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
58(3)
862
- 870
2004.
PMID:
14967443.
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.012
43
Sato H
,
Niimi A
,
Yasuhara T
,
Permata TBM
,
Hagiwara Y
,
Isono M
,
Nuryadi E
,
Sekine R
,
Oike T
,
Kakoti S
,
Yoshimoto Y
,
Held KD
,
Suzuki Y
,
Kono K
,
Miyagawa K
,
Nakano T
&
Shibata A
. DNA double-strand break repair pathway regulates PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. Nat Commun.
8(1)
1751
2017.
PMID:
29170499.
DOI:
10.1038/s41467-017-01883-9
44
Antonia SJ
,
Villegas A
,
Daniel D
,
Vicente D
,
Murakami S
,
Hui R
,
Kurata T
,
Chiappori A
,
Lee KH
,
de Wit M
,
Cho BC
,
Bourhaba M
,
Quantin X
,
Tokito T
,
Mekhail T
,
Planchard D
,
Kim YC
,
Karapetis CS
,
Hiret S
,
Ostoros G
,
Kubota K
,
Gray JE
,
Paz-Ares L
,
de Castro Carpeño J
,
Faivre-Finn C
,
Reck M
,
Vansteenkiste J
,
Spigel DR
,
Wadsworth C
,
Melillo G
,
Taboada M
,
Dennis PA
,
Özgüroğlu M
&
PACIFIC Investigators
. Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med.
379(24)
2342
- 2350
2018.
PMID:
30280658.
DOI:
10.1056/NEJMoa1809697
45
Shamseddine A
,
Zeidan YH
,
El Husseini Z
,
Kreidieh M
,
Al Darazi M
,
Turfa R
,
Kattan J
,
Khalifeh I
,
Mukherji D
,
Temraz S
,
Alqasem K
,
Amarin R
,
Al Awabdeh T
,
Deeba S
,
Jamali F
,
Mohamad I
,
Elkhaldi M
,
Daoud F
,
Al Masri M
,
Dabous A
,
Hushki A
,
Jaber O
,
Charafeddine M
&
Geara F
. Efficacy and safety-in analysis of short-course radiation followed by mFOLFOX-6 plus avelumab for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Radiat Oncol.
15(1)
233
2020.
PMID:
33028346.
DOI:
10.1186/s13014-020-01673-6
46
Yang J
,
Xu H
,
Guo X
,
Zhang J
,
Ye X
,
Yang Y
&
Ma X
. Pretreatment inflammatory indexes as prognostic predictors for survival in colorectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Sci Rep.
8(1)
3044
2018.
PMID:
29445100.
DOI:
10.1038/s41598-018-21093-7
47
Chen ZY
,
Raghav K
,
Lieu CH
,
Jiang ZQ
,
Eng C
,
Vauthey JN
,
Chang GJ
,
Qiao W
,
Morris J
,
Hong D
,
Hoff P
,
Tran H
,
Menter DG
,
Heymach J
,
Overman M
&
Kopetz S
. Cytokine profile and prognostic significance of high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer.
112(6)
1088
- 1097
2015.
PMID:
25688736.
DOI:
10.1038/bjc.2015.61